Criticism of Johnson’s relaxation in the UK



[ad_1]

DIt could have climbed the summit, but the descent from the mountain often turns out to be more dangerous, Boris Johnson said in his television address on Sunday night. The image put up in the pandemic politically caught the Prime Minister on Monday. His step-by-step concept for getting out of the running of the bulls, presented as a “calendar sketch”, has been declared unthinkable, unclear, even ruthless. Despite the criticism coming mainly from political opponents, the government struggled to face the storm of accusations.

Jochen Buchsteiner

Johnson, at least from his own party’s point of view, was by no means advanced. His plan was to take into account the concerns of both sides of society, he said: fear of the virus, as well as fear associated with “forced inactivity.” The immediate relaxation, which he later announced, was reluctant in international comparison. Only a few exit restrictions have been lifted.

To work, but without public transport.

You are now allowed to meet a member of another household in the public space and leave the house as often as you like. Stores and schools, on the other hand, will be closed for at least three weeks. At best, gastronomy can wait for July. Entry rules have even been tightened, and for the first time the British are faced with the invitation to cover their faces when shopping and on buses and trains.

Outrage from the Labor Party, unions and the left-wing nationalist government in Scotland sparked Johnson’s message above all to those who cannot work from home. He “actively encouraged” them to return to their jobs and avoid public transportation as far as possible. Many complained that the protection measures had not been clarified. There are no guidelines on how to set the distance at work, nor are there any precautions on local public transportation. Especially in London, where many do not have a car and the way to work is often too far for the bicycle, millions depend on the tube and buses.