[ad_1]
The money is said to have been smuggled into the Zimmermann and Stangls companies through “false invoices” to “boost sales.”
Why Pucher granted them loans is a mystery given his opinion of their economic competence. Zimmermann (65) was “a good craftsman,” but “overwhelmed by the business management of the company,” said Pucher of his childhood friend: “From my point of view, Zimmermann had a hard time distinguishing between sales and profits.” Puchers Conclusion: In economic terms it is a “bottle”.
Zimmermann’s reaction is no less harsh: “What can you believe in a criminal like Pucher who dedicates himself to avoiding responsibility? The responsibility is his, ”says Walter Gröblinger, a spokesman for Zimmermann, who rejects the charge of financial incompetence. “I have always trusted Pucher and he has disappointed me. As we now know, he had criminal energy from the beginning. “
Stangl (61) also defends himself. “My client has not received cash or smuggled it into his company,” says Mirko Matkovits, a lawyer for Stangl. Rather, Stangl’s responsibilities to the bank arose “almost exclusively through forced patronage” (for SV Mattersburg, of which Pucher was president). Pucher claims “never to have asked for sponsorship.”
