[ad_1]
The authorities had learned of the attempted purchase of ammunition by the latest Vienna attacker in Slovakia by 10 September, but did not file a complaint or inform the prosecutor or judicial authorities, according to the FPÖ complaint.
8:27 am, November 7, 2020
The FPÖ reimburses due to the Investigative accidents in the run-up to the terrorist attack in Vienna Report suspected abuse of office. It is directed against unknown perpetrators within the investigating authorities. The SPÖ, on the other hand, calls for a tightening of the citizenship law. This should allow a perpetrator to be deprived of his citizenship.
Buying ammunition in Slovakia
The report submitted to the APA indicates that the Austrian authorities were informed of the attempted purchase of ammunition on July 23, 2020, a fact that emerged from a letter from the Slovak national crime agency that was made known on Wednesday. According to this document, on 10 September the Austrian liaison office of Europol informed the Slovak authorities that the Austrian police already knew of one of the two failed ammunition buyers in connection with terrorism. It was also noted that the person in question (who would later become the Vienna assassin) had been sentenced to 22 months in prison as an IS sympathizer in a terrorist trial in 2019.
In the General Secretariat of the FPÖ Michael Schnedlitz at Economic Prosecutor and Corruption It is also mentioned that, according to a report by the news portal zackzack.at, this information was sent to the departments of “Intelligence Service” and “Terrorism and Extremism” of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Against Terrorism ( BVT). The Vienna State Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Fight Against Terrorism (LVT Vienna) was also informed.
“It is therefore certain that the Austrian authorities were aware of the incident in July 2020,” the announcement read. And they also knew “that an Islamist threat who had already been convicted of belonging to a terrorist organization and had been released prematurely from prison” had tried to get ammunition for war material. This leads to the conclusion that the person concerned also had a prohibited weapon and, in certain circumstances, several prohibited weapons.
The killer would have been arrested
However, no incident report was submitted to the prosecutor, the FPÖ writes in its report. The court, which is reviewing the probation of the man on probation (in December 2019 instead of July 2020), was not informed of the suspected ammunition purchase. The “main judicial representatives” would confirm that it can be assumed that the later murderer would have been arrested if the judiciary had learned of the attempted purchase of ammunition. Because in the event of a threat, this action would have been enough to initially suspect that criminal acts are being planned again.
Therefore, there is a well-founded suspicion that the authorities have “deliberately” abused their authority as a body “deliberately” by “not knowingly carrying out all the steps of the investigation” or “by failing to inform or inform the judicial authorities to knowingly, “according to the report. .
The attack “should have been avoided”
by Herbert Kickl, president of the FPÖ club It is therefore “absolutely clear that the terrible Islamist attack could not only have been prevented, but should have been avoided,” as he said in a written statement to the APA. “This ruling, which, incidentally, allegedly constitutes abuse of power, was the condition for the murderer to be on the run on November 2. If this report had not been lost, the subsequent murderer would have been withdrawn from circulation prior to that. could have left a trail of blood in the center of Vienna. “
Notice of withdrawal
“ÖVP Minister of the Interior Nehammer assumes political responsibility and has to resign, “Kickl repeated his call after the departure of the department head. The FPÖ club president also emphasized that BVT officials should have realized that this act would lead to the” immediate lifting of freedom conditional “- and They should have reported this to the court and could and should have arrested subsequent terrorists” immediately due to imminent danger “, even without the involvement of the judiciary.
