[ad_1]
“However, the court must evaluate the evidence with respect to all the test results, the court must carefully and conscientiously examine all the evidence to determine its credibility and probative value, both individually and in its internal context, what happened in the case and, therefore, the court is the only admissible result, that is to a complete acquittal of all the accused, at least in the absence of the subjective facts of each individual accused. “
“The evidence has shown that J., E., V. and H. did not carry out the aforementioned donation activity knowingly an abuse of their power of disposition and there was no doubt that the defendants acted without malicious intent. Not all people who are well connected The defendants convinced the Senate that, due to the fund’s tendency to dissolve, they were convinced that it could be charitable and non-profit within the meaning of the BSFG. In addition, the donations also went through official bodies, such as the mayor’s office. or the archdiocese. “
“The responsibility of the respective accused has not been refuted by a single piece of evidence.”
“The responsibility of the accused was always free of contradictions, but it did not seem to have been agreed upon and, in cohesion with the witnesses who were only heard in the main hearing, especially in the political sphere, it was quite credible, so it had to be followed responsibility and acquittal was issued in case of doubt Objectively seen individually, the donation activity was not linguistically covered by the content of the statutes, so the evidentiary procedure, which included and evaluated all the evidence, led to the fact that that the subjective facts of the accused in both aspects could not be verified with the certainty required for the criminal process. “
