[ad_1]
This finding follows the argument of two children and their parents against the regulation issued in May on the alternation of face-to-face teaching in schools and the use of mouth and nose protection outside of class.
The complainants alleged against the regulations relating to the rest of the 2019/2020 school year that “the contested provisions violate the principle of equality, the right to privacy and the right to education.” “With the finding published today, the VfGH has declared that the contested provisions were illegal,” he now says. “Despite having been requested, the Federal Minister did not submit to the Constitutional Court any file on the entry into force of the ordinance, so he could not explain why he considered the challenged measures necessary. Therefore, these measures were imposed illegally, “the Supreme Court said.
