Doctors view crown measurements as “completely excessive.”



[ad_1]

In a press conference at the invitation of the ICI (evidence-based corona information initiative), doctors agreed that the corona risk was presented in a completely exaggerated way, the measures were not based on evidence, but the consequences were much more dangerous than the own virus. especially in terms of social isolation, commitment to MNS as well as PCR testing strategy. The government’s measures will be lifted with a referendum and HC Strache also announced a referendum.

AUSTRIA. The front against the government’s crown measures is widening. On Wednesday, the doctors gave a press conference in conjunction with the critical initiative ICI. The unanimous opinion is that simply wearing protective masks is counterproductive. Both from a medical and psychological point of view.

Mask requirement?

From a medical point of view, according to the ICI, the use of masks is a health risk for two reasons:
– The accumulation of bacteria, viruses and fungi in a warm and humid environment. Ideal conditions for breeding! These pathogens are inhaled again in a concentrated manner.
– accumulation of CO2 in the blood. As this is not exhaled well, it accumulates in the blood and has a negative effect on all bodily functions, including the brain> among other things worse
Ability to concentrate These two negative effects would be particularly evident in older people and / or with previous illnesses.

The overload never happened

Andreas Sönnichsen, Department of General Medicine, MedUni Vienna Center for Public Health: “The danger posed by COVID-19 is greatly overestimated due to the deaths the disease has caused in certain countries. Mortality rates are due to living conditions, the condition and orientation of the health system, and the different counting methods used in the statistics. The result was disproportionate prevention measures that cause more psychological, economic and health harm than good. In the spring of 2020, it was a stated political goal to protect our healthcare system from overload. But this overload never happened. The maximum occupancy of hospital capacity was five percent, that of intensive care beds was 26 percent. The tens of thousands of deaths foreseen never happened ”, criticizes the expert.

Criticism of protective masks

Sönnichsen also has his doubts about the MNS: “There is no evidence of the protective effect of the self-made fabric lapels, which are usually worn under the nose, are rarely washed and are temporarily stored in the pockets of the pants. These generalized masks are extremely unsanitary and probably correct more harm than good. “

“Misuse of PCR tests”

Martin Haditsch, specialist in hygiene and microbiology, infectious diseases and tropical medicine, also criticizes: “The government’s approach is not yet based on scientific evidence and causes confusion and fear through constantly new, incomprehensible but also unworkable requirements. PCR tests are great for diagnosing sick people, but not for examining healthy people and they are not approved for this either. Now they are being misused ”. Haditsch also claims that the mortality of infected people is extremely low and is currently declining. This is due to the increase in medical knowledge in therapy, the lower average age of the patients or the weakening of the disease-causing effect of the virus.

More deaths during the confinement

Christian Fiala, GP, OB / GYN specialist and scientist: “The data and the facts are clear and positive: since March 12 it has been documented on the basis of the cruise ship ‘Diamond Princess’ and since then it has been repeatedly confirmed because of the course of the spread in Austria, that only a few people are infected with the new coronavirus, only a small proportion get sick and very few people die. People are at risk if they have previous illnesses and are over 70 or 80 years old In the last influenza season there were, including Covid-19, significantly fewer deaths than in previous years. However, the Ministry of Health defines a confirmed case “exclusively based on a PCR test, which is not suitable and not It is approved for it, and regardless of whether there are any symptoms of the disease. Depending on the number of tests performed and depending on the people who are tested, there are per t anto more or more less positive results. Due to the increasing number of tests and the resulting increasingly positive results, measures are being introduced that are not very effective in preventing the spread of a respiratory virus, but that can have numerous negative consequences, especially for those people we really want to protect . For example, not fewer people died during the confinement, but more. “

It masks the danger to pregnant women.

Regarding the mask requirement, the doctor said: “I would like to emphasize the possible risk of pregnant women wearing a mask. Because CO2 (carbon dioxide) accumulates in the body, even in the fetus. We know from experience that breathing is affected in the Pregnant woman can cause delays in the development of the fetus. Therefore, there is a risk that we expose an entire year of children to this risk. Corona measures will change the basis of medicine and long experience in treating influenza and influenza infections are ignored, it is obvious that this is to the detriment of all people.

Psychological and health harm to children

Christian Schubert, a psychoneuroimmunologist, investigates the interaction between the psyche and the immune system. The doctor points out that children and adolescents can suffer serious health damage from Covid measures, which can even cause death.

“Many children and adolescents were exposed to severe psychological stress as part of the confinement measures. In some cases they are still under severe psychological stress. This stress is not only caused directly by quarantine conditions, where families are in confined spaces, no contact and child-friendly social activities. Stressed parents have also transferred their stress to children. Stress is also a result of the still existing restrictions, requirements and prohibitions that children have to go through every day, in the private sector and especially in kindergarten and school. “

Measures hamper child development

And Mediziner continues: “The mandatory use of respiratory masks at school symbolizes the risk of a fatal viral infection. Therefore, MNS is associated with the constant fear of endangering their own lives, as well as those of others. Schubert’s conclusion: children and young people run the risk of being hampered in their integral development, being exposed to fear and stress and being traumatized; they can then develop serious secondary diseases “.

Reason for the referendum

On the part of the referendum it says: “In view of the numerous restrictions arbitrarily ordered by the state and the consequent massive harm to many people, as well as to society and the economy, the federal legislature should make the following changes”:

  • Withdrawal of the law: Withdrawal of all laws passed this year in relation to Corona (the so-called Covid-19 measures), including changes to the previous epidemic law.
  • Damage claims: Damage claims under the above epidemic law must be enforceable legal claims and not petitions. Legal protection must therefore be given, a court of law.
  • Administrative sanctions: Administrative sanctions will be suspended according to the so-called Covid-19 laws or decrees of action. All related administrative criminal proceedings must be stopped immediately. Fines paid will be refunded.
  • Transparency: All experts and their reports commissioned by the government in the context of the Covid 19 epidemic must be published. It must be shown and clearly visible which actions have been taken based on political considerations and which are scientifically based.
  • Relief funds: Relief funds within the scope of Covid 19 measures should only be paid on the basis of a corresponding detailed legal basis.
  • Data protection: Medical data, including a person’s immunity status, must remain private in all circumstances. Authorizations, for example for events, freedom of travel and authorizations, should not depend in any way on a person’s immunity.
  • Reform of the Constitutional Court: Establishment of a Senate structure, since the Constitutional Court currently only decides in plenary session within the framework of 4 sessions per year. In addition, the possibility of urgent decisions by the Constitutional Court should be given.
  • Amendment to the law of official responsibility: In the case of unconstitutional laws, official responsibility should be possible, even if this law has been applied legally. There is currently no possibility of asserting official liability claims based on the legal application of such laws after an unconstitutional law has been repealed.

initiative-corona.info
Click here to go to the non-partisan referendum page

Strache also announced a referendum

The mask requirement currently costs the business around € 500 million a month in sales. The trade association is even assuming that Austrians will spend 16 billion euros less this year than in 2019. “For months, therefore, I have been calling for an end to this unspeakable crown ban policy and an immediate return to normal life, “HC Strache said on a Wednesday Broadcast. All these scare tactics and this overdramatization must finally stop, because the mortality in relation to the corona virus is much lower than we were led to believe at first. Because of this exaggerated ban policy with mandatory masking and registration, threatened curfews and now a possible second blockade Strache went on to say that there was no longer any standing. He also wanted to start a referendum across Austria to lift these absurd mandatory Crown measures and return to our normalcy.

Voting (online since March)

What do you think about this? Comment and discuss it in the comment field below!

Population approval for corona measures is crumbling

The number of infections in neighboring countries is increasing

[ad_2]