[ad_1]
The 40-year-old defendant was sentenced to life in prison in the Greinsfurth murder trial. The judgment is not final.
CITY OF AMTETTEN. (ip) Also on the third day of the trial for the murder of a 52-year-old branch manager, the 40-year-old defendant, who brutally strangled the woman on May 28, 2019 in the supermarket parking lot in Greinsfurth, cut her off the doll and finally stole it. have (district documents reported).
Unanimous jury verdict
After several hours of deliberation, the defendant was unanimously sentenced by the eight jurors to life imprisonment for murder and grave robbery (not legally binding), for which the presiding judge Doris Wais-Pfeffer referred to the particularly insidious procedure with which the man had murdered the victim. . The defendant’s comment: “That’s a lie!”
Immediately prior to the allegations by prosecutor Leopold Bien and defense attorney Michael Dohr, the attorney submitted new requests for evidence in relation to his client’s cell phone, which was lost about a year ago on the Danube, as the data could show a motion profile that says the defendant was not at the crime scene at the time of the crime. Previous investigation by IT forensic experts was not adequate to alleviate the German. In addition, Presiding Judge Doris Wais-Pfeffer justified the rejection of the requests that the mobile phone had been washed away by running water and that additional data could hardly be obtained due to the lapse of time.
Defendant: “I didn’t do anything to the woman!”
In his closing remarks, Bien addressed primarily the evidence underlying the defendant’s guilt. These include, above all, a scratch on the man’s face, which, recognizable in a photo, comes from the victim, and which has the corresponding DNA fingerprints of the accused under the fingernails and on the back. His statement about the fact that he bumped into the woman while shopping at the branch and that she accidentally scratched him was refuted by statements from his employees, the prosecutor said. Other traces of the man’s DNA in the woman’s vehicle, her presence in the parking lot around the time of the crime and, last but not least, the victim’s cell phone that was seized from her are all indications of her perpetration.
Defense attorney Dohr tried to raise the greatest amount of doubt in the jury about his client’s 100% fault. Among other things, he clung to the gaps in the movement’s profile. The fact that a perpetrator strangles a victim for up to five minutes also tends to indicate an act of relationship, and there is no motive for murder for Germans.
Finally, the defendant spoke. He eloquently commented on the accusations and emphasized several times: “I didn’t do anything to the woman!”
