As a result of a recent report by the American Academy of Pediatrics, cases of coronavirus are growing faster in children than in adults, new research will shed light on how it manifests itself in young people – and the need to make sure they are not. Spread the virus quietly.
Study published in JAMA Pediatrics On friday, From February 18 to March 31, 91 South Korean children were followed up with confirmed cases of infection. As 40% of adults reported no symptoms, a significant number of children tested positive without showing any signs of the virus. Of the 91 total, 20 were completely asymptomatic (i.e., no symptoms of the virus), 18 were non-asymptomatic (i.e., later developed symptoms) and 53 had symptoms, most of which were mild or moderate.
Data collected from 22 health centers relied heavily on South Korea’s aggressive contact tracing program and subsequent tests in open homes (including those without symptoms). The authors write that relying solely on therapeutic testing, they would have missed 93 percent of the cases. It is a conclusion that may have implications for transition. The authors conclude that “infected children with or without symptoms are more likely to continue their normal activities, which may contribute to viral circulation in their community,” the authors conclude.
In the study’s editorial, Dr. W. Head of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, D.C. Meghan Delaney notes that U.S. Not ready to identify asymptomatic children – which can make the epidemic worse. Daleny and her co-author, pediatric infectious disease specialist Dr. Roberta L. “A surveillance strategy that only tests therapeutic children will fail to identify children who quietly infect the virus while roaming about their community and schools,” says DBAC. “In regions where the use of face masks by the general public is not widely accepted or used, asymptomatic carriers can serve as an important reservoir that facilitates peaceful spread in the community.”
Delaney – who has been testing children at Children’s National since March – says not focusing on children and coronaviruses has led to dangerous myths, such as the belief that they are somehow immune. “It simply came to our notice then [kids] “They weren’t affected when the truth was,” Delney told Yahoo Life. “However, when you compare a group of children with a group of adults, we find that adults are more likely to get serious disease, while children are less likely to get it.”
When it comes to the lack of serious illness in promising children, it resonates with South Korean researchers to note the potential effects of a high number of asymptomatic and presynaptic children. “They saw kids living at home who were probably doing very well … but some of them actually had the virus,” says Dellney. “Some of them became pathological and some of them did not.”
This can have an impact on how the disease spreads in the school, especially in light of updated guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which have no symptoms indicating that testing is not needed. “This [study] This could mean that there are children in the community here who are not pathologically infected in the United States, who have the virus, and who are not sick either. [have] “Very mild illness,” says Dale.
Dr. Dara Kas, a medical contributor to Yahoo Life, says schools should take note of the findings. He says, “The school is a good candidate for surveillance due to the prevalence of children, asymptomatic and prognostic cases. “But if you’re not doing surveillance, you definitely need to [have] Wearing a mask. ”
Cass notes that another important aspect of the study focuses on viral shedding – how long the body releases the virus (for example, by sneezing and coughing). As a final data point, the researchers measured the number of days of viral shedding and averaged an average of 17. The number was lower for children with these pathological children (average of 14.1 days) and higher for symptomatic children, with at least half of the population still showing the presence of the virus in 21 days.
The discovery of how long the coronavirus lasts in the respiratory system of children is an important window, but Delney pointed out one important difference: however, one can still infect a virus, which does not mean that it is really enough to be infected. “The tests we’re doing here are looking for virus genes … so if we find any viral genes, the test will be positive,” says Dale. “We think that over time your body’s immune system is fighting the virus and at the end of the infection we can find out … it’s just remnants. The virus has become active and the immune system has destroyed it, but there is still a viral type of waste in your body. ”
Dell hopes that the U.S. No areas can advance contact tracing for similar studies, and in the meantime warn against further clarifying the results. Cass offers protection and emphasizes the need to wear a universal mask until surveillance is done regularly. “If we don’t know enough about how long we’re going to be infected – and the period by which you’re infected, not therapeutically – then we’re wearing the mask that is the best defense we currently have,” says Cass. Is. “This article repeats that point.”
For Latest coronavirus news and updates, Follow along https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus. According to experts, more than 60 people and those who are immunocompromised are at the highest risk. If you have questions, please refer to this CDC And Of the WHO Tool guides.
Read more from Yahoo Life
Want to get lifestyle and wellness news in your inbox? Sign up here For Yahoo Life’s newsletter.
