Why didn’t the police open fire to destroy the kidnapper in Thu Duc? | News



[ad_1]

How Youth Reflect, around 20 o’clock on November 21, a young man with unusual expressions, suspected of being “stubborn”, suddenly brought a gun to a dairy on To Ngoc Van Street (Tam Phu Ward, Thu Duc District, HCMC) controls 2 women and 1 baby. This person tightly wrapped the three of them with duct tape and then used a knife to press against the neck of the three slowly towards the street.

Although the Tam Phu District Police Force coordinated with the Thu Duc District Police were present at the scene immediately after that to persuade the youths to surrender their weapons and release the hostages. However, this person was uncooperative and at the same time displayed a more aggressive attitude. The police took almost an hour to control the young man. The 3 victims were safely rescued but panicked and had to be hospitalized.

Images and clips of the incident appeared dense on social media immediately afterward with mixed opinions. In particular, many people wondered why the police were present at the scene early but too late to control the subject. The “stubborn” object is often not sober, but the law enforcement agency chooses the negotiation method and does the negotiation take too long to ensure the safety of the hostages? …

To exchange Youth On this situation, Major General To An Xo, Head of the Secretariat of the Ministry of Public Security, said that any hostage rescue case will only be considered a success if the hostage is released and terminated. You can minimize both human and material damage.

“In the case of rescuing 3 people who were immobilized by a stonemason with a knife in the Thu Duc district, Ho Chi Minh City, on the night of November 21, I think that the Ho Chi Minh City police did it very good when rescuing. safety for victims and timely control of offenders, without letting unfortunate consequences occur, ”said Major General To An Xo, saying that he had received quite a few thoughts on this incident. In which, there are views that it is risky for functional forces to let drug addicts control hostages for too long, and why don’t the police open fire when the law allows it?

“If you just look at some photos and clips, it is difficult to judge why rescuing the hostages depends on the force directly carrying out the mission on site. Depending on each specific situation, the police have to analyze and evaluate and propose the best option among many possible plans, not simply shooting or not shooting ”, general. Bucket said.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Public Security also mentioned a number of specific cases, in which, in Bac Giang province, there was a case where a stoned man used a sickle to control hostages and then barricaded himself in the house. . “When we arrived at the scene, we identified the kidnapper with a very sharp alkaline rice cutter attached to the hostage’s neck and dragged him to the bathroom to close the door. The police at that time had enough tools and facilities to handle them, but we did not choose the shooting plan because the scene was far from the medical center and the road was difficult. In case of the shooting, but the hostage still had the sickle cut in the neck, he could not be transferred to the emergency room in time. Thanks to persistent campaign and persuasion, the Bac Giang province police successfully rescued and ensured the safety of the hostages and kidnappers, ”said Major General To An Xo.

Although there are provisions in the Law on Administration and Use of Weapons, Explosives and Support Tools, which allow police forces to open fire in many cases, including kidnapping. I believe, but Major General To An Xo said that the shooting was the last resort when there were no other measures, and at the same time it was necessary to have a process, a process of assessing the situation and preventing risks. “The results of the rescue show it all, why the police must open fire while there are better methods,” said the Soviet general.

Under what circumstances can public service officials open fire?

The Law on the Management and Use of Weapons, Explosives and Support Tools, in force as of July 2018, specifies cases of military shootings in the performance of security and order tasks.
Consequently, independent executors must give warnings with actions, verbal orders or direct shots before shooting in the following cases: the person is using weapons, explosives, force or other tools and means of attack or counterattack that threaten life or health the executor of public duty or another; persons who use weapons, explosives, force or other tools or means to disturb public order and threaten the life, health or property of others; people wanted, arrested, emergency detainees, detained, detained, escorted, tried or executed a prison sentence are fighting back, threatening their life and health. executor of public service or other person; the object is to hit those escorted, detained, detained or escorted for serious crimes, very serious crimes, particularly serious crimes, dangerous recidivism.

The police can open fire when they know you are committing a serious crime, a very serious crime or a particularly serious crime; be authorized to open fire on road motor vehicles, means of transport by inland waterways, except vehicles of diplomatic missions, foreign consular offices, representative offices of international organizations stop said vehicle in case the object that operates that vehicle attacks directly or threatens the life of the service person or another person; You will be allowed to open fire when it is known that a vehicle controlled by a criminal intentionally fled, except in cases where the vehicle is carrying people or hostages; knowing clearly in the vehicle that the criminal is carrying or illegal weapons, explosives, reactionary documents, state secrets, drugs or national treasures that are intentionally fleeing, unless the vehicle contains carrying people or taking hostages.



[ad_2]