[ad_1]
|
Duong Nhue and the tragedy of the imprisonment of Nguyen Van Lam and Mr. Pham Thi Quyet |
At the same time, the Thai Binh Province People’s Protection Institute requested the Thai Binh City Police to reinstate the investigation and clarify the previous allegations.
Mr. Nguyen Van Lam and Ms. Pham Thi Quyet |
Before that, like Youth reported, on 11.11.2020, at the Thai Binh Province People’s Court, the Hanoi High People’s Court opened an appeal court session on a criminal case of credit abuse and property appropriation for two defendant Nguyen Van Lam (58 years old, who lives at 138 Nguyen Danh Doi Street, Tran Lam neighborhood, Thai Binh city) and Pham Thi Quyet (53 years old, his wife Lam).
After the court session, the Panel of the Supreme People’s Court of Hanoi decided to cancel the judgment of first instance No. 25 of June 12, 2019 of the People’s Court of Thai Binh Province and return the file to the People’s Court of the province of Thai Binh for resolution in accordance with the regulations of the law. Mr. Lam and Ms. Quyet were also released on bail for 2 years in detention.
At the same time, the Group requested the Thai Binh Province People’s Prosecutor’s Office and the Thai Binh Province Police Department to annul the decision not to prosecute criminal case No. 12 of March 29, 2018 by the Thai Binh City Police and, at the same time, prosecute the case. reinstated the investigation of Duong “Nhue” and his subordinates by occupying the headquarters of Lam Quyet Co., Ltd.
|
Gangster leader Duong Nhue said he was “caught and put in the back” in the case involving Mr. Nguyen Van Lam’s partner, Ms. Pham Thi Quyet. |
The “Nhue” complaint form from Mr. Lam, Ms. Quyet has the content: Because Lam Quyet Co., Ltd. has signed many contracts, you need a lot of capital to buy materials and raw materials for production, so that Lam and his wife Quyet borrowed money from Mr. Nguyen Xuan Duong (often called Duong “Nhue”) many times, the total amount was 1.7 billion VND with an oral negotiable interest rate of 2,000 VND / million / day , without loan term.
Because Mr. Lam and Ms. Quyet had no money to pay the debt, from October 3-19, 2017, Duong “Nhue” and his youth descended to occupy, destroy and destroy property at Lam Quyet headquarters Co., Ltd. to press company transfer request to Duong.
During this time, Duong called frequently and threatened to force Mr. Lam to license or sell the company to Mr. Duong. Mr. Lam provided a lot of evidence on this, including a recording of his talk in October 2017, showing that Mr. Lam was threatened: “If you don’t sell the company, it’s better to escape, not to Thai Binh.” , “If you step back to find yourself somewhere near there”, “prepare for the young man to kill, accept and then raise the young man in prison” …
Fearful, Mr. Lam sent a petition to the Thai Binh City Police and other authorities in Thai Binh Province to report the incident. The Thai Binh City Police invited Mr. Lam and Ms. Quyet to work.
However, Mr. Lam Ms. Quyet said that, unexpectedly, this working session only revolved around how Ms. Quyet borrowed from someone else’s civilian, but did not address the fact that the Quyet company of the Mr. Lam was vandalized. property, Mr. Lam was threatened with death by Duong. On March 29, 2018, the Thai Binh Police Department of the CSDT has Notice No. 12, announcing not to prosecute the criminal case for Duong’s complaint.
Raising his opinion on this incident, lawyer Tran Hong Linh (Hai Phong City Bar Association) said: “After viewing the application, watching video clips, recording files and evidence of the case, I realized that the incident crime “threat of murder”; crime “that illegally infringes on the residence of other persons”; crime of “confiscation of property”; crime of “destruction or intentional damage of property”. The procedural agencies must process this case, investigate and have clear notice, avoid raising the question “Is the crime covered?”
According to the law, if the serious matter is exactly what the victim reported, if it is not involved, the local investigating agency can also be held responsible for infringing judicial activities, for example the crime of “abuse of positions and powers in service “; the crime of “failing to examine criminal responsibility.”
|
Tears after the sentencing of the spouses of debt director Duong Nhue |
In this case, Ms. Dinh Thi Ly (57 years old, resident in the city of Thai Binh) filed a complaint to denounce Nguyen Xuan Duong without reasoning that her son Mai The Duy (32 years old) suffered 15% of his health . right at Tran Lam Ward Police Station to Thai Binh City Police.
On May 5, 2015, the Thai Binh City Police Police Department prosecuted the case for intentionally damaging the content of his complaint. On July 5, 2015, this agency decided to suspend the investigation of the case because the accused has not been identified and the investigation period expires. In April 2020, Duong “Nhue” and his wife were prosecuted and arrested in a different case, the case of Ms Dinh Thi Ly was returned for investigation.
On April 21, 2020, Thai Binh City Police issued a decision to prosecute the defendant against Nguyen Xuan Duong for investigating acts with signs of intentional crime causing intentional injury in accordance with the provisions of Clause 2, Article 104 Of code. Offender.
The Thai Binh City People’s Court then sentenced the defendant Nguyen Xuan Duong to 30 months in prison for intentionally causing injury, the application period is as of April 13, 2020.
[ad_2]
