What role did Duong Nhue and his adoptive son play in the case of business owner Lam Quyen?



[ad_1]

Saturday May 2, 2020 09:57 AM (GMT + 7)

On 2/5, the information that PV obtained referred to the case of “Confidence abuse and property appropriation” of a couple who was threatened with death by Nguyen Xuan Duong (Duong “Nhue”, Thai Binh) has set a date for the appeal hearing.

Specifically, the Supreme People’s Court in Hanoi decided to conduct an appeal trial of criminal cases against two defendants, Nguyen Van Lam (SN 1962, Thai Binh) and the Thai Binh People’s Court. fines for breach of trust and appropriation of assets with a sentence of 14 years in prison; Pham Thi Quyet (SN 1967, Thai Binh), was sanctioned by the Thai Binh Province People’s Court for trusting the misuse of the appropriation of property with a sentence of 13 years in prison in 2019.

Both defendants appeal the first instance verdict.

Mr. Liem and Ms. Quyet’s appeal will open at 8 a.m. on 5/11, at the Thai Binh Province People’s Court, Hanoi People’s Court. The case is heard publicly.

In the first instance verdict on June 12, 2019, the victim was Mr. Do Van Toi, Ms. Le Thi Tuyet.

In particular, Duong “Nhue” and adopted Bui Manh Tien (“White” Tien) also appeared in this case. According to the first instance sentence, Tang and Tien were witnesses in the case where Mr. and Mrs. Lay, Quyet were the accused.

What role did Duong Nhue and his adoptive son play in the case of business owner Lam Quyen? - one

“Nhue” and the adopted child appear as witnesses in the Lam Quyet case.

In addition to “Nhue” and the adopted children, there are two other witnesses in this case. However, “Nhue” and “white” Tien were absent from the trial, only the other two witnesses were Mr. Nguyen Van Nhan and Mr. Nguyen Ba Ngoc (both in Thai Do, Thai Thuy, Thai Binh commune).

Persons with related rights and obligations in the case are Mr. Pham Cong Tu (Thai Binh City), Tong Thi Hue (Thai Binh City), Pham Van Manh (Thai Binh City), Nguyen Thi Linh (TP. Thai Binh).

In the trial of first instance, Mr. Tu and Ms. Hue filed requests for trial in absentia. The “white” roads of Nhue and Tien were duly summoned but still absent. Defenders of the accused, Mr. Manh was informed of the time and place of the sentence, but was still absent. for a reason, the trial panel sentenced them to be absent.

According to the verdict of the Trial Chamber at first instance, the charged loan decision of Mr. Lan, Mr. Toi and Ms. Tuyet amounted to VND 900 million through 2 loan contracts. Before the loan was repaid, the defendants used fraudulent methods to avoid paying the debt by selling mortgaged properties, but they lied that it was not sold, it was not paid, but they cheated the money paid and complained about the reason for the documents. receipts paid to Mr. Toi by the “Nhue” road that the company appropriated, when Mr. Toi applied for the mortgage, there was an act of dispersal of the mortgaged property to usurp the previous amount.

The acts of the accused Lan and Quyet infringed on the property rights of others.

The nature, seriousness and consequences of the criminal acts committed by the accused in the courts of first instance are extremely serious, causing great harm to society, infringing on the property rights of citizens, infringing on the social order and safety.

The defendants borrow money from victims who have not yet paid, but give false reasons to usurp the nine hundred million dong amount. The court of first instance determined that he was a mere accomplice, the two defendants agreed to the will to commit the crime and practice the same, but the defendant Sam did a more positive act, which sent him a lie. Come on, cars don’t sell to others, bring cars to ship, remove license plate to avoid detection. Therefore, Mr. Lan is the one who plays the first role.

Defendant Determined to be a helper, sign car sales papers for Mr. Tu, cheat on the money and complain about the reason he lost Mr. Toi’s money receipt to usurp the loan amount . take the 2nd role

Recently, these two people were transferred to preventive measures, they were released on bail instead of being detained while awaiting the appeal trial.

Source: http: //danviet.vn/tin-tuc/duong-nhue-va-con-nuoi-co-vai-tro-gi-trong-vu-an-chu-dn-lam-quyet-1084 …

Road

With many tricks to intimidate, threaten and control, Nguyen Xuan Duong and his colleagues forced companies to provide services …

[ad_2]