[ad_1]
The earlier judgment was made in the latest NASIC and ballistic missile threat report, posted on the center’s website on January 11. “At the end of November 2018, China tested the new JL-3 in the Bohai Sea. The JL-3 has a longer range than the JL-2,” the report says.
According to the report, the number of warheads attached to Chinese missiles capable of threatening the United States will rise to 100 over the next five years, compared to 16 warheads for China’s most powerful land-launched missile. Kingdom is DF-41.
Similarly, in a study published on January 19, the American Federation of Scientists (FAS) identified that the JL-3 is a big step forward compared to the previous version which is the JL-2. “The most important information in the China section of the NASIC report is that the JL-3 … can carry multiple warheads and has a range of more than 10,000 km. That’s a significant increase in capacity compared to JL-2, ”the FAS study writes.
The JL-2 has a range of approximately 7,200 km, it has been equipped on the Type 094A nuclear submarine since 2015. The JL-3 missile is expected to be used on China’s next generation Type 096 nuclear submarine next year 2025.
|
Security expert Malcolm Davis of the Australian Institute for Strategic Policy Research also said that while it provides China with the ability to withstand a nuclear attack, the JL-series missile must be launched off the coast. The warhead can be deployed on the east coast of the NOS. Davis also said that deploying submarines capable of launching such an unusual ballistic missile without being detected is a challenge for China, according to the report. SCMP.
Meanwhile, security expert Timothy Heath from the research organization Rand Corporation (USA) said that together with the DF-41, the JL-3 provides China with many means to target the American continent from a very long range. . “The nuclear and non-nuclear weapons capabilities of the Chinese military increase the risk and loss of any US war with China. The goal is to convince the United States that such a war is not worth risking, allowing China to win a confrontation with its neighbor like Taiwan without having to fight the United States, “Heath said.
[ad_2]