[ad_1]
As the first to say the last word, the defendant Tran Van Minh, former chairman of the Da Nang City People’s Committee, asked the Panel to completely review the case in order to deliver a fair trial, not to justify innocent people. Defendant Minh said that he did not commit two crimes: violating regulations on the administration and use of state assets, causing waste and waste; Violation of regulations on land management, such as the indictment of the courts of first instance.
The Panel agreed that the content Mr. Minh mentioned was clarified in the discussion. Before the podium, the former chairman of the Da Nang People’s Committee expressed his grief when many Da Nang city leaders have to go to court this time. In particular, many people are old and have many diseases, so the Council should ask them for consideration and mitigation.
Former Da Nang People’s Committee Chairman Van Huu Chien also asked the appeals court to say that the accused did not commit two crimes as the trial court ruled. Mr. Chien said that both he and the defendants who are Da Nang City leaders have a common desire to make Da Nang a rich and beautiful city without the intention of colluding with each other to profit.
In closing words, the defendant Phan Van Anh Vu (also known as “Aluminum” Vu, former chairman of the Administrative Board of the Construction Stock Company 79, Bac Nam Joint Stock Company 79) continued to deny 2 crimes that were tried by the court first instance. end The defendant assumes that he is the buyer, cannot decide the conversion policy or price. If it is false, the seller must be responsible, not attributable to the buyer. The defendant also stated that he did not associate with any Da Nang official, and therefore could not be an accessory to other defendants in the case. “In today’s trial, the defendant did not ask the Panel for anything, but only requested a severe sentence if he could prove that the defendant was guilty, otherwise he could not release the defendant,” defendant Vu said. speak in court.
Most of the remaining defendants in the case asked the Panel to consider reducing the sentence or exempting them from criminal liability.
According to the prosecution, there are reasons to determine that defendants Tran Van Minh, Van Huu Chien and Phan Van Anh Vu have agreed to illegal acts. Specifically, Phan Van Anh Vu’s business was not eligible to buy houses and public land, but the defendant took advantage of his relationships with the defendant Minh, thanks to state companies that assisted him. After acquiring, in many ways, defendant Vu illegally transferred these assets to his name.
Defendant Vu’s behavior was followed by the leadership of Da Nang city leaders, creating inequality between companies for a long time … Receiving the rights to transfer ownership, administration and exploitation in 22 houses, Land Public and 7 land projects resulted in the state losing more than 22 billion dong.
However, for the remaining group of defendants, the High-Level People’s Procuratorate said that there are extenuating circumstances that should ask the Panel to consider reducing penalties for defendants from 6 to 12 months in prison.
As scheduled, at 2:00 p.m. on the 12th, the Panel will pronounce the sentence.
[ad_2]
