VOICE: The editor of the first grade textbook shouldn’t joke with the public!



[ad_1]

The new first grade textbooks (textbooks) introduced into schools have provoked a number of disturbing negative reactions.

Although admitting that the new presents conflicting opinions is, of course, natural, especially when it comes to people, homes, and the education of young children, an area of ​​extreme sensitivity and importance.

But before so many “hotels” were pointed out by a large number of people, instead of calmly receiving, attentive listening, even clarifying the differences to understand rationality, Professor Nguyen Minh Thuyet, the editor-in-chief of the “Kite Kite” series is trying very little convincingly, like “pouring oil on fire”, making many people even more upset.

The masterpieces of the great world writers La Fontaine or Lev Tolstoy, the masters of parables who have left a human mark for generations, suddenly become a joke, emotionless and shit through the pieces a hairy story with head of Ngo, So, north leg, south arm, another man’s beard, another woman’s chin skull

Many parents are frightened by lamenting and fear that the book will harm their children when reading the parables “Two horses”, “Rows and dogs”, “Ticks and chickens”, “Crabs, storks and fish” … There is already a delicate word series, slang words “slap, grab, shit, hug” for carefree use. The book also teaches children to fight jealousy like “High mountains, the rivers are still long / Five years of resentment, eternal fight against jealousy” whose purpose is only “to put four horizontal bars on the model”.

1st grade students in the first year of contact with letters, they learn rhyme, they learn language, but they also learn literature, they learn to be human, not only e, i leaves, ú ơ. Therefore, parents cannot help but worry about the book publishing team’s arrangements.

Perhaps, there is no need to reiterate the questions before parables, sentences, rhymes, to play, move through the stone, easy to deduce, easy to spread on children’s heads. What the public expects is the serious and demanding attitude of the authors, led by Professor Nguyen Minh Thuyet as editor-in-chief.

There are too many angry people who want to talk to the editor-in-chief, but there won’t be a direct dialogue if the author still borrows Tolstoy as a shield. “A great writer like you is sure. Certainly none of these are counter-educational accounts.

Yes, Russian writers and writers are not contraeducated, only those who misunderstand and use them. “People are calm, read carefully, understand the work of teaching first graders before evaluating” is fundamental, but it cannot be said that “there is never a society satisfied with education” or argue because Competition between Textbooks should lead to much criticism and then ignore public opinion.

Sir, no one wants bookies to “cut and plow in the middle of the road” but they can’t see wrong without correcting. Listen to the opinion of the majority of the people of the nation, many people even suggest quitting smoking, not just publishing books!

According to Professor Thuyet, “For the first time after 1975 in Vietnam, there were textbooks on socialization, not made with state money but entirely with private money. This is very new.” But that is only one side of the problem, the other is very important, that each citizen, parents should spend money to buy books for their children to study with the burden of “profit from making textbooks” from investors. As “special customers”, parents have the right to choose the best products for their children. If the “book producers” do not listen to the opinions, they capture the legitimate needs of the “consumers”, they must have the right to refuse.

To put it bluntly, the “Kite” series is said to be the educational administrator’s best choice among the 5 candidate textbooks. The experience and choice of professionals is very important, but do not forget people’s options. It is people who spend money to buy books!

Whether or not the gravel particles in first grade textbooks can be picked up, repaired for continued use, or replaced with new books, the fact that parents have to spend money to buy expensive or cheap books should be considered. , but the future of our children is even more important.

Personally, I respect Professor Thuyet, a professor who used to be a member of the National Assembly and who has astutely criticized the national succession of life, but cannot rely on the argument as “a great writer definitely does not.” What is the composition of the anti-educational story. “What interests me is what the teacher and the authors talk to people about: how do they use books for their children and grandchildren?

And what is more important, the drastic clarification of the Ministry of Education and Training, the highest authority responsible to the people of the nation for the use of new first grade textbooks as?



[ad_2]