[ad_1]
In this case, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System (former Deputy CEO of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of National Defense) is one of two defendants who appealed the entire first instance verdict and appealed.
Giving the reason for the appeal in court, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System said that the defendant appealed the entire first instance judgment and complained about not performing the fraudulent act of appropriation of property because the first instance court treated him unfairly. same. According to this defendant, the defendant’s complaints were expressed during the investigation and trial, but not recognized by the court of first instance.
In front of the court this morning, the defendant also denied his relationship with companies such as Duc Binh Group Joint Stock Company, Yen Khanh Production-Trading-Service Co., Ltd. (Yen Khanh Company), and said that he did not participate in the negotiation and signing of a contract for land number 7 – 9 Ton Duc Thang (Ben Nghe Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City).
The Panel announced the testimony of the defendants Pham Van Diet, CEO of Duc Binh Group Joint Stock Company, CEO of Yen Khanh Company; and Vu Thi Hoan, director of Yen Khanh Company. Therefore, these defendants claim that these companies are established by Dinh Ngoc System, which operates and directs all related activities.
However, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System insisted: “There is no evidence that he is deceiving, but the prosecution agency used other testimonies to accuse. Although these people have full capacity and capacity to assume responsibility for their responsibilities ”.
When the president proposed to give his opinion on the testimony of the defendant Dinh Ngoc System, the defendant Hoan commented: “Mr. System said it is not true.”
In particular, during an interrogation in court that same afternoon, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System suddenly apologized to the Trial Panel and the investigating agency and admitted that the assets and the Company belonged to the defendant. the defendant set a trap and asked Vu Thi Hoan to stand next to his name. However, this defendant still did not admit to the fraudulent appropriation of property and said that all violations and consequences were the responsibility of defendant Pham Van Diet.
|
According to the first instance ruling, in the period 2006-2010, the defendants from the Navy (QCHQ) and Hai Thanh Company (under the QCHQ) converted 3 defense grounds on Ton Duc Thang Street (HCMC). to economic land for 49 years in contravention of legal provisions, or under the direction of the Minister of National Defense. In which the defendant Dinh Ngoc System established Yen Khanh Company and asked his nephew, Vu Thi Hoan, to act as director. In 2006, Dinh Ngoc System proposed QCHQ to Yen Khanh Company to enter into a joint venture with Hai Thanh Company to construct a building in National Defense Ground No. 7-9 Ton Duc Thang. Although the Yen Khanh company was established recently, the defendant Vu Thi Hoan’s management system made a report that reflects the truth to cooperate. The Defendant System then instructed the related defendants to change the owner’s name on the land use right certificate, modify the content of the joint venture contract to appropriate the right to dispose of the land. The Dinh Ngoc System then instructed Pham Van Diet to bring land as collateral to the BIDV bank for the companies he established to borrow capital to do business with more than 500 billion outstanding VND loans. Therefore, the Panel found that defendant System, Diệt, Hoan had cheated to usurp QCHQ’s 7-9 territorial area, worth more than VND 525 billion in 2010.
The first instance court panel sentenced the defendant Dinh Ngoc System to 20 years in prison for defrauding assets. Also for this crime, the defendant Pham Van Diet was sentenced to 15 years in prison, Vu Thi Hoan to 7 years in prison. |
[ad_2]
