[ad_1]
Why does one person find more corrupt people prosecuting. Is it true that in addition to the degradation and metamorphosis of civil servants, there are gaps that lead to the situation of “fat in the cat’s mouth”?
Dr. Dinh Van Minh, Director of the Legal Department of Government Inspection continues to discuss with VietNamNet to find a mechanism to encourage and protect people who dare to think, dare to do and dare to take responsibility for good common.
Legs tied, hands tied by procedures and regulations
As he said, there is a reason why the current mechanism is not clear, which makes it difficult for the executors of public services to confirm what is right and what is wrong, leading to few people “dare to think, dare to do, dare to take responsibility “. However, Secretary General and President of State Nguyen Phu Trong once pointed out, “Why is this mechanism still not working well in one place and doing well in other places”?
Yes. Answering the question of the Secretary General and the President is not easy, but at least you can see that, in the same mechanism and policy, one place does it better than another if there are people who care. blood, for the common good, dare to think, dare to do, dare to break through and willing to assume responsibilities before the Party and the people.
 |
The new birth has never been easy. Reform without an answer is not reform. Therefore, we must have mechanisms to encourage new ideas, good practices, new ones, even contrary to current regulations and processes. And above all, there must be a mechanism to protect people who are willing to face difficulties for the interests of the Party, the State and the people.
In addition to the objective cause of the inconsistent and unclear mechanism, in your opinion, are there other reasons why cadres and civil servants hesitate to innovate and dare to break through?
It is also important to mention here how the evaluation of our staff is not without factors that hinder development. In many cases, staff evaluation relies heavily on the ballot. That is true, but it is not always good because people still say “not doing it is not bad, the more you do, the more bad”.
Therefore, those who are chubby, do not, “go lightly, speak softly, smile gracefully”, the votes are high. And whoever did it, they touched, above all the thoughts, the works that were beneficial to the group but did not agree with the wishes of some individuals, touching their interests would make many people dislike. and it results in low votes.
For this reason, it is very important to have a mechanism to protect and encourage strong people who dare to think, dare to do and dare to assume responsibilities so that they can do better things for the State and for the peoples. Uncle Ho once recalled “Listen to the masses, but absolutely do not” follow “the masses.
Speaking of people who dare to think, dare to do and dare to take responsibility, people often think of changing the five cadres that are leaders. Currently, both in Party policies and in state legal policies, “the responsibility of the boss” is mentioned a lot, but in reality few people “dare to think, dare to do, dare to assume responsibilities” like the Party wishes?
It must be recognized that the current liability mechanism is not favorable. Most legal documents and Party resolutions emphasize the chief’s responsibility to be absolutely right.
People say “what’s up”, “head of any movement”, we all admit that the role of a leader is important and that promoting the responsibility of the leader is necessary.
But in fact, the current leader himself does not have complete power within the field he is in charge, not to mention many things that have to depend on many agencies and units. Perhaps due to concerns about abuse of power, fear of inappropriateness of office holders and powers, coupled with the assignment of offices and powers, we have too many binding mechanisms that are believed to be controllable, but in fact give up. head.
Solving something requires too many steps, too many processes, steps, and is largely collective. As a result, the head has a great responsibility, but the regulatory process limits it to its feet and hands.
On the contrary, when there is a problem, it is difficult to manage your responsibilities because the decision has been made through many stages and is collective in nature. That is why it is necessary to assign powers associated with personal responsibility to the boss. Even for staff work, they should have the right to choose the best equipment for the job. Don’t associate this with the ekip, the scene …
I am the leader, I must have the right to choose the best officers I trust for the job and I am responsible. So we really show strong support for new ways of thinking, new ways of doing, encouraging and protecting people who are active, creative, daring to think and daring to do.
Why does a person discover more corruption when dealing with a person?
In fact, in getting things done, sometimes the line between creativity, flexibility, practical application and mistakes is very fragile. So how do you clearly define this, avoid losing good officers who can do a job?
It must be said that those who dare to think, dare to make breakthroughs are often poignant, and often come across situations that find themselves in the middle of a fine line between good and evil.
People who dare to do it often have to take certain risks and have no legal security, but the most important thing is that they do it for the common good. This is a factor for state agencies, competent agencies and leaders to evaluate the motives and purposes of employment of cadres and party members.
 |
| Dr. Dinh Van Minh, Head of the Legal Department, Government Inspector. Photo: T. Hoang |
Dare to think, dare not to take risks, make steps but have a theoretical and practical base and a careful and exhaustive calculation when implementing an idea, a job. Reality is the standard of truth, job performance is the highest measure for staff evaluation.
Responsible agencies must consider and acknowledge in an objective and multidimensional way. There are situations that force staff to do so, there may even be procedural errors, but with the correct objectives, good reasons, good results, they must be evaluated and encouraged.
Nor should inspection and examination agencies “pluck feathers, find traces” to “catch, unmask”; But as Uncle Ho said, “If you see wrong, tell people to correct it.” Of course, any case that is deliberately wrong must be handled.
So, according to you, to encourage and protect those who dare to think, dare to do, dare to take responsibility for the common good, what mechanism should exist?
Any cause then that solution. For example, for the responsibility of the leader, it is now necessary to see what gives people the real authority to do the common good, and self-interest must be responsible.
In particular, in terms of mechanisms and policies, we often advocate for laws to come to life, resolutions to come to life, but one very important thing is to bring the law to life, to resolutions. New things or things need to be institutionalized quickly, but it requires that there be a scientific basis, close to the reality of life, that breathes life, that arises from life and comes back to life, not just requests, desires They are subjective only will.
Assign responsibilities and control responsibilities, not create too many processes and procedures as a universal control tool, it is not.
Also, in the history of anti-corruption, it is essentially about curing, but curing requires taking medication, which is true, but often has side effects as well. The opinions of the Party, State and Secretary-General and President have also said that, to combat corruption, appropriate measures must be taken, not rushed.
For this reason, in each specific period, we have adequate measures and solutions. If we find that there is something inappropriate or “harmful or harmful”, we must immediately adjust it.
Along with the current management of many officials, we have to see why this is the case, why we only deal with one more corrupt people … Also, our management mechanism, the loopholes, is unreasonable to lead to a situation of “mouth of cat”.
Therefore, when something happens, you have to assess very fairly what is wrong, what is the situation, what is the mechanism. Since then, adjust and give the appropriate measures and solutions.
In my opinion, in the project of the Central Organizing Committee that is being built, a message should be given showing the political determination of the Party in leadership, the direction is to encourage, motivate and protect those who dare to think, dare to do, dare to take responsibility for the common good.
Thu Hang
