[ad_1]
On the afternoon of 12/5, the Hanoi High Court continued an appeal session for the acquisition of gold land, which took place in Da Nang City. After reviewing all the appeal sessions, the Panel sentenced the sentences to the former Da Nang City President: Tran Van Minh (17 years in prison) and Phan Van Anh Vu (ie Vu “aluminum” 25 years in prison) ). on 2 crimes “Violation of the regulations on the management and use of State assets that cause loss and waste” and “Violation of the regulations on land management” Detention of the accused Tran Van Minh to guarantee the execution of the sentences.
In particular, the defendant Van Huu Chien, former chairman of the Da Nang People’s Committee, the Board of Appeals decided to reduce part of the sentence, pronouncing a 10-year sentence for two crimes “Violation of regulations on the administration and use of the property The state causes loss and waste “and” Violation of regulations on land management. “Arrest defendant Chien to guarantee the execution of the sentence. Previously, the Court of First Instance sentenced Mr. 12 years to prison to the two crimes.
The defendants heard the court ruling.
After many days of public trial, the appeals court said that for the defendants who appealed, HDXX discovered that investigating authorities had collected many documents signed by defendants Tran Van Minh and Van Huu Chien.
Specifically, in the period 2006-2014, the defendant Tran Van Minh – Chairman of the Da Nang People’s Committee (from 2006 to 2011) and the defendant Van Huu Chien – Chairman of the Da Nang People’s Committee (period 2011 – 2014), are leaders, responsible for directing the management and use of state assets, land management in the area.
However, defendants Tran Van Minh and Van Huu Chien have intentionally acted against regulations on the management and use of state property and regulations on land management.
The two defendants accepted the policy, signed and issued many documents, and instructed their subordinates to carry out the allocation of land, recovery, leasing, transfer of the right to use the land, change of purpose of use. of land and the transfer of houses and land. productions in Da Nang City; price reduction, reduction of profit ratio, conversion of names of beneficiaries of land use rights against the law for many houses, public land and investment projects in construction.
Defendant Tran Van Minh.
Since then, Tran Van Minh and his accomplices have created the conditions for Phan Van Anh Vu to directly receive the property, management and exploitation rights to 15/22 houses, public land and land projects 6/7. on the basis of creating an opportunity for Vu “aluminum” to decide on the transfer, exploitation, use … in order to obtain profits, causing the State amount to be damaged in 22 public real estate with a value of more than VND 2.4 billion; in 7 projects it exceeds 19.6 billion dong.
Based on the evidence document included in the case file, the statements of the defendants at the investigation stage, as well as at the trial, the Panel found that there were sufficient grounds to determine the actions of the defendants Tran Van Minh and Van. Huu Chien violated the provisions of the law when the first instance verdict was concluded, so the Appeals Panel did not accept the appeals of defendants Tran Van Minh and Van Huu Chien.
For the defendant Phan Van Anh Vu, the Panel decided that the defendant Phan Van Anh Vu had his name and asked his relatives to establish and contribute capital and directly manage the activities of 5 companies. Furthermore, Vu took advantage of illegal documents issued by Da Nang leaders, leveraging his relationship with Da Nang leaders to create the conditions for himself to use and buy public real estate.
Although the defendant denied the above content, but based on the testimonies of other defendants in the case, it shows the defendant’s relationship with Da Nang leaders. Therefore, the court of first instance determined that the accused was an “accomplice” as a base.
Afternoon summary of the appeals court 12/5.According to the Panel, this is a case of particularly great damages, the behavior of the accused has caused frustration in public opinion and in people. Taking the case to trial is extremely necessary. Considering the role of each defendant, the Panel found the defendant Tran Van Minh to be the lead role, directing other defendants under his authority to commit criminal acts. The trial process, the defendant is not really aware of his mistakes.
Defendant Van Huu Chien is an accomplice who helps defendant Minh to commit the violations mentioned above. However, in the appeal trial, the defendant stated that he had partially overcome the damage, so the Panel determined that it is possible to consider reducing part of the punishment for the defendant.
Considering the appeal of people with related duties and interests, the Panel found that because of documents illegally issued by the defendant Minh, there is no basis for accepting the appeal of people with rights and obligations. related cases
[ad_2]
