[ad_1]
The Saigon Club has a controversial player transfer policy.
Gia Dinh Club (the team that just won tickets from second to first class) gave shocking information by “denouncing” coach Vu Tien Thanh of Saigon request a player without contacting the host team directly. President Gia Dinh – Huynh Hoang Truong confirmed it.
And Mr. Vu Tien Thanh, President and Coach of Saigon, has completely denied manipulating Gia Dinh’s player, Tran Tan Tai. He said Tai actively called to express his desire to return to Saigon to test his work.
No controversy between the two parties is discussed here, but clearly, the history of the Saigon club handover seems paradoxical. After the 2020 season, Saigon said goodbye to 18/28 players with a message “new wine must be new”. As Mr. Vu Tien Thanh said: “Saigon needs radical changes and reforms because of its great ambition.”
But let’s see who has Saigon and who will recruit. That’s Nam Dinh’s Do Merlo, a foreign soldier who will turn 36 next season. The player was recruited by Nam Dinh’s “poor house team” after Da Nang no longer used it. Even Thiago Melo is also the player who proved his success in Da Nang, he just moved to Nam Dinh in the 2020 season. After struggling in the relegation race, Saigon hosted Thiago Melo and Do Merlo. .
And a player like Quoc Long, despite plowing all fronts with Saigon last season, was promoted to assistant at the Training Academy, which only existed on paper. That was the reason for the departure of the captain from Saigon. As explained by Mr. Vu Tien Thanh, “the team’s rejuvenation strategy, we liquidated the player’s contract with Quoc Long to promote him as coach of the Youth Training Academy.”
That’s it, Do Merlo is 35 years old, but he still has a red carpet to invite. Even if the striker is naturalized, he is no longer in the same shape as before. Or that Saigon is accused of “going at night” with the player Tran Tan Tai, who only plays for Gia Dinh in the Second Division. The fact that they intend to recruit players to play on a team is still a great move, raising many questions from the public.
Saigon let go of a number of expert and professional players, but has signed contracts with some old players or contacting players at the lower level is a clear problem.
Mr. Vu Tien Thanh said that the departure of the players was voluntary, not due to layoffs. But looking at how the “Saigon people” exclaimed in disappointment is enough to understand that they don’t want to be separated like that. The way Saigon liked it with Quoc Long, for example, was to stick around but actively let the players leave.
Perhaps, the “good drama” in Saigon is still ahead.
[ad_2]
