[ad_1]
Defendant Nguyen Quang Vinh (former head of examination room) left court – Photo: DANH TRONG
14-5, The trial of 15 first instance defendants in the 2018 cheating high school test scores in Hoa Binh continued the interrogation portion of representatives of the Prosecutor’s Office (VKS) with defendants Do Manh Tuan, Nguyen Khac Tuan and Nguyen Quang Vinh to clarify the accusations of correcting the test scores.
Responding to the question from the VKS representative, Mr. Do Manh Tuan said that in early May 2018, Mr. Nguyen Quang Vinh spoke about the need to improve the score for some candidates who are children of industry officials and other relationships and agreed.
When the incident was discovered, Vinh called Mr. Tuan to exchange that if it broke, he asked Mr. Tuan to take full responsibility, to The fact that the test is corrected is subjective.
“Vinh told the defendant to ask him if he was alone To admit He left his wife and children and everything outside the brothers will take care “, presented Mr. Tuan.
Under the agreement of the former director of the Department of Education and Training, Bui Trong Dac and Mr. Khuong Ngoc Chat (former head of the department of internal political security), Mr. Tuan came to the Hoa Binh provincial police to surrender, accepting all responsibility for himself, chunks arbitrarily extract the key after finishing drawing everything to correct.
After working with the investigative agency, Mr. Tuan invited Nguyen Khac Tuan to Mr. Vinh’s house to speak about being deeply focused on who is running, who is the mastermind, and what is the purpose.
Here, Mr. Vinh continued to warn Manh Tuan: “If you get to the end of the road and you cannot deny the crime, you will accept the confession and tell the truth, but he will only accept the part of irresponsibility.”
However, Manh Tuan later found that this was unreasonable, so he told the police the whole truth.
“I look forward to the Panel’s review. The defendant is only a deputy director of a district boarding school, so he is not talented, competent, or good enough to handle such a large provincial exam. If there is no help and shield from everywhere, the accused cannot make this mistake, “said Manh Tuan.
Similarly, when asked, the defendant Nguyen Khac Tuan (former laboratory technician) said that because Manh Tuan dragged and respected him, he participated in setting the test scores and testified. It was Mr. Vinh who gave Manh Tuan the key to open the door to the exam room and correct the score.
Defendant Nguyen Quang Vinh (former head of examination room) left court – Photo: DANH TRONG
Contrary to the testimony of Manh Tuan and Khac Tuan, defendant Nguyen Quang Vinh said that Manh Tuan’s testimony was “false”.
before In court, Mr. Vinh confirmed that there was no discussion and created the conditions for Manh Tuan to raise the points with the candidates.
Mr. Vinh acknowledged after Manh Tuan worked with the investigative agency about saying “I am dead, so you died.”
“Only accused he said that, but he didn’t tell Manh Tuan how to deal with investigative agencies, “Vinh said at the same time. ruling out giving Tuan Tuan the key to open the exam room, refusing to speak to Khuong Ngoc Chat to create a loophole for officials who fix the exam.
According to Mr. Vinh, he chose Manh Tuan to take the exam because Manh Tuan had good computer skills and experience. Take the exam.
“The defendant is just irresponsible and a little subjective when he mismanages his assistant team so that Manh Tuan can make a mistake. Later, the defendant discovered that if he managed better, there would be no problem.” “Defendant Vinh said.
Before the VKS question: “Better management than how to manage?”, Mr. Vinh hesitated: “I don’t know which is better, but I will not let my subordinates catch up with me.”
