[ad_1]
Propose to the National Assembly to monitor and inform voters soon about their official opinions on the case.
Send recommendations to the Judicial Committee, voters of Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang, An Giang, Dak Lak … expressing interest in the judgment of the Supreme People’s Court Judicial Council on the Ho Duy Hai case, and request the National Assembly, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly and the Judicial Committee overseeing this case, to promptly inform the voters and the people of their official views on the case.
In response to this request, the Judicial Committee said that, on August 8, the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court issued the Decision of Review of Cassation to hear the Ho Duy Hai case, deciding to uphold the appeal judgment. The Ho Chi Minh City Supreme People’s Court of Appeal sentenced defendant Ho Duy Hai to death for “murder” and “property theft”.
The Judicial Committee concluded that this is a particularly serious and complicated case that has lasted for many years and is of concern to voters and public opinion.
During the period of the XIII National Assembly, the Supreme Supervision Team of the National Assembly on the unjust situation, wrong in the application of criminal law, has informed the National Assembly about this case in the criminal process.
In order to fully consider the issues related to the case, the Permanent Commission of the National Assembly assigned the Judicial Commission to study it. The Judicial Committee has held a committee meeting and is reporting the results of the investigation to the competent authorities.
In response to this request from the voters, the Judicial Committee has not clearly expressed its opinion on the case.
Earlier, in the press conference that ended the ninth session in June, the Secretary General of the National Assembly, Nguyen Hanh Phuc, said that on June 16 the Judicial Committee held a plenary session to consider this content. Consequently, the committee members received an opinion form.
It is suggested that the National Assembly more closely supervise investigation, prosecution and adjudication activities
Also in connection with the case, voters in Hanoi and several other localities expressed appreciation for the results of the performance of judicial agencies in recent times, and have investigated and tried many special cases. Especially serious, people across the country agree.
Voters called on the National Assembly to more closely monitor the investigation, prosecution and adjudication so as not to make false mistakes, not to overlook crimes and to consolidate people’s belief in the judiciary.
In giving its opinion, the Judicial Committee said that in recent years, the National Assembly and National Assembly agencies have increased oversight of the activities of the Judiciary such as: asking questions at meetings of the National Assembly. The National Assembly, session of the Standing Committee of the National Assembly for the Government, President of the Supreme People’s Court, Chief Prosecutor of the Supreme People’s Prosecutor’s Office, Minister of Public Security, Minister of Justice for activities investigation, prosecution, adjudication, execution sentence.
At the same time, exercise the supreme thematic supervision of the National Assembly over the Judicial Power.
Along with that, the Judicial Committee holds explanatory sessions annually, conducts thematic supervision of judicial agencies and related agencies; supervise the resolution of complaints and accusations from individuals, agencies and organizations in the judicial sphere, focusing on monitoring the activities of judicial agencies in investigation, prosecution, adjudication, especially large and complex cases, cases of public interest …
Through monitoring, the responsibilities of each judicial agency have been clarified; proposing to implement many solutions to improve the quality of investigation, prosecution, adjudication, execution of sentences, guarantee the right person, the right crime, the law, limit injustice, evil and omit crime.
The Judicial Committee also said that it had promptly suggested to the Minister of Public Security, the President of the Supreme People’s Court and the Chief of the Supreme People’s Prosecutor’s Office that they consider and handle a number of specific cases. ensure compliance with the law and respond to public opinion and voters.
Upon receiving the opinions of the voters, the National Assembly, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly, the Judicial Committee affirmed that they would strengthen the closer follow-up of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of the agencies. The judicial authorities, in order to minimize unjust, false and negligent crimes, contribute to improving the quality of the activities of judicial bodies and strengthen the trust of voters in the judiciary.
|
Communication will go well “so that the population of the entire country can promptly receive complete and official information on cases resolved by the courts.” When submitting petitions to the Supreme People’s Court, voters Ben Tre said that, in the past, several court cases have not created a high consensus among the people, creating poor public opinion, especially in a case where hostile forces take advantage, incite the situation to destabilize the country. Propose to the Judiciary to rectify the professional work to improve the quality of the trials. In response to this request, the People’s Supreme Court said that in recent years, the judicial sector has determined that improving the quality of the trial, solving all kinds of cases under the jurisdiction of the court is an important political task. important. With in-depth knowledge and active implementation of the proposed solutions, over the last few years, the quality and effectiveness of the settlement and adjudication of various types of judgments has continued to be guaranteed and much progress has been made. The percentage of sentences and decisions annulled and modified due to subjective court reasons for many years has been limited to a low level, decreasing over the years and is now below 1.5%, meeting the goal of the Decree. decided by the National Assembly. Particularly in 2020 (from October 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020), the courts have accepted 550,830 cases, resolved 408,908 cases (reaching a rate of 74.23%); Compared to the same period in 2019, the number of accepted cases increased by 11,271 cases. The quality of the trials continues to be guaranteed and progresses. The percentage of sentences and decisions to be annulled or modified for subjective reasons of the court is 1.1%, complying with the requirements established by the National Assembly. In addition to doing a good professional job, improving the quality of adjudication, solving all kinds of cases, the Party’s Civil Affairs Commission, the Supreme People’s Court leaders said they will continue to run the people’s courts. It is important to do communication well so that the peoples of the entire country can receive complete and official information in a timely manner on the cases resolved by the courts, in order to guide and generate good public opinion in society, to limit the enemy forces take advantage , incite, divide, provoke political instability, social order and security. |
[ad_2]
