The case of the “monkey” Tuan shot and killed 5 people with his AK rifle: What did Ty Ba Di testify in court? | News



[ad_1]

19 defendants appeared in court this morning in the case of Tuan “monkey” shot and killed 5 people with AK rifles due to conflicts in the casino, notably the defendant Pham Thanh Tam (ie Ty Ba Di, 33 years old, living in Tay Ninh) a weapons supplier, housing more than 802 million dong, stolen by Tran Quoc Tuan (Tuan “monkey”, 33 years old, living in H. Cu Chi).

Ty Ba Du declared the origin of the “monkey” AK Tuan shot people in the pocket

In the trial, the defendant Pham Thanh Tam admitted “the crime of illegally storing military weapons”, without admitting “the crime of harboring property committed by other people” according to the indictment.

The case of

Defendant Ty Ba Du (Tuesday from left to right) on the morning of December 15

Photo: BN

Defendant Tam presented, when Tuan “monkey” came to get and gave him the bag, Tam did not know there was money inside. Believing in the place of his friends, Tam agreed to accept and keep the bag for Tuan. After that, Tam and the defendant Le Van Tam went to look for Tuan, but they did not meet, so he opened the bag and found that he had money. He did not intend to keep the property that Tuan “monkey” had committed. After a while, the defendant Tam learned the amount of money that Tuan had stolen from the casino.

19 people involved in the “monkey” Tuan case shot and killed 5 people in court

Ty Ba Du brought a gun from Cambodia to give Tuan “Monkey”

Regarding the act of illegal storage of weapons, the defendant Tam said: “Due to his love of playing weapons, he bought a large quantity. On the other hand, the defendant has no knowledge of the law, not knowing that the act of playing weapons is a crime, crime, causing serious consequences. The defendant hopes that the Panel mitigates the penalty. “

This defendant submitted that because his home was near the border gate, he was watching when the border guard was asleep, and then secretly brought the gun back to Vietnam. There were 2 grenades left when the defendant took a canal on the way to Cambodia and took it home to hide it.

Specifically, Tam brought a weapon to Vietnam in turn gave 1 K54 weapon to Tran Quoc Dat, he gave 1 AK weapon to Tuan “monkey” and Tuan “monkey” used this weapon causing the case of 5 dead, 1 person injured .

At the trial this morning (December 15), the panel also conducted the questioning of the accused: Le Van Tam, Tran Anh Thi, Pham Tan Cuong, Le Quoc Minh.

The defendant Thi presented while keeping his bag of money, knew that the money that was stolen from Tuan in the casino should take the initiative to take all the money to the police.

Defendant Cuong unconsciously confessed to the crime, hoping that the Panel would consider it.

This afternoon (December 15), the first instance trial of the defendants in the Tuan “Monkey” case shot and killed 5 people with AK rifles due to the conflict in the casino.

Tuan “monkey” fired three shots to counterattack when he was arrested on the night of February 13

According to the indictment, 19 defendants in the Tuan ‘mono’ case shot and killed 5 people with AK, the defendant Pham Thanh Tam was proposed to prosecute 2 crimes of “harboring property by other people” and “possession” . Unauthorized military weapons ”.

8 defendants: Nguyen Phuoc Linh, Nguyen Dung Si, Tran Dinh Phuoc Thinh, Nguyen Trung Kien, Nguyen Minh Di, Nguyen Chanh Phap, Tran Quoc Dat, Nguyen Van Vui were proposed for prosecution for “illegal possession of weapons”. military gas ”.

It was proposed to prosecute 5 defendants: Le Van Tam, Pham Tan Cuong, Dang Anh Tuan, Le Quoc Minh and Tran Anh Thi for “harboring property that another person has committed”.

In addition, the defendant Dang Ngoc Trung was charged with “failing to report criminals” and four defendants, Nguyen Duy Thanh, Vo Hong Tam, Ly Van Me and Nguyen Kim Ngan, were charged with “concealing criminals”. .

The accusation identifies that the previous conduct of the accused is very dangerous for society, has violated and negatively affects social order and security, so it is necessary to strictly comply with the law to dissuade, educate and general precautions.



[ad_2]