[ad_1]
First graders are taught not only to know the first words of their life, but also to “write” about their innocence and pure heart.
Regarding comments about the content of first grade textbooks, there are still many vulgar words, not suitable for the education of first grade students, Professor Tran Dinh Su, president of the Vietnamese Language Assessment Council, said that Words like “chicks”, “hens”, “cha”, “táp” are all in the Vietnamese Dictionary edited by Hoang Phe, so it is impossible to say that they are not common.
Furthermore, Prof Tran Dinh Su analyzed, the word “cup” in the article “Crab, stork and herd of fish (1)” is used to refer to vulgar food. In the context of this lesson, using the word “cup” is entirely appropriate, not incorrect.
Fully agree with Professor Tran Dinh Su, teaching first graders the above words is not bad. Because those words are words from the Vietnamese dictionary, they exist in the life of communication and are used in Vietnamese writing.
However, it is inappropriate to use profanity to teach first graders.
There are many words in the dictionary, but they are numbered, with pretty words, bad words, not in the dictionary, so they just put them in the books for the students.
Teach Vietnamese to first graders, including rhyming technique. Choose beautiful and highly educational words to teach them instead of vulgar words. Words like “thank you”, “sorry”, “please”, “please”, if the editor intentionally used the work to include it, they will.
Vietnamese language is rich, many words have deep and beautiful meanings, so we should choose those words to put on the first page of the book, so that our children can approach Vietnamese textbooks at school and study alone. all beautiful words.
Other words like “bang”, “mug” (eat bad, bad meaning), then the students will know too, in no rush to fill their heads from first grade.
Therefore, bookmakers must listen and absorb the opinions of the public.
Faced with the reaction of public opinion, the Ministry of Education and Training (Education and Training) has just proposed to review Vietnamese first grade textbooks, but who will be the reviewer. If they are the editors themselves, as well as those on the review board, the review will not reach an objective conclusion.
The book’s composers said they did it very carefully, and critics praised it for being very beautiful, very wonderful. They no longer have the role of reviewer.
Science is objective, to be objective there must be an independent assembly, in addition to the ancients.
We must do it with all our minds and hearts, for the sake of our own children.
[ad_2]
