[ad_1]
Defendant Tran Thi Kim Chi said she was not guilty of embezzling money from banks and clients for personal gain. However, the defendant Le Vuong Hoang, former auditor; Nguyen Thi Minh Hue, former head of the Treasury Accounting Department, and Chu Van Nha, former Treasurer (both from OceanBank, Hai Phong Branch) pleaded guilty and said that he only obeyed Ms. Chi’s instructions.
Meanwhile, the OceanBank representative said the defendants committed fraud, appropriating property, not embezzlement.
According to the accusation of the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, from May 2012 to August 2017, the defendants abused their assigned positions and powers, took advantage of the bank’s loopholes in the management and issuance of savings cards (TTK). , has received savings deposits from clients but has not registered them in the management system; short-term settlement, fraudulent establishment of customer mortgage loan documents; issued 109 off-system accounts to 27 clients to usurp OceanBank Hai Phong branch with a total amount of more than 400 billion dong.
The defendants also caused damages to OceanBank for more than 9 billion dong (which is the interest of the 107 stock markets).
At the trial, giving his opinion, the representative of the Hai Phong People’s Protection Institute said that the accusation of prosecuting 4 defendants of embezzlement is well founded. The Hai Phong People’s Institute said that the defendant Chi and the defendant Hoang are responsible for the total amount allocated. Defendant Hue should be responsible for helping Ms. Chi usurp 243 billion VND. Defendant Nha must be responsible for helping Ms. Chi usurp 20 billion VND.
According to the representative of the Hai Phong City People’s Institute, the defendants committed particularly serious crimes, appropriating large amounts of money, for which they should be strictly punished. Defendant Chi was tried by the Hai Phong City People’s Protection Institute as a mastermind, directing the administration of other defendants in the act of appropriation.
During the investigation and interrogation in court, the defendant Chi did not sincerely report, did not regret, must apply the highest level of the penalty framework.
The defendants Hoang and Hue have a practical role but have made a sincere statement, which is why an indefinite prison sentence is necessary. The defendant Nha has a lower role than the other defendants, making a sincere statement should be given a prison sentence within the framework of the sentence.
The representative of the Hai Phong City People’s Protection Institute proposed to punish the defendant Tran Thi Kim Chi with the death penalty; the defendants Le Vuong Hoang and Nguyen Thi Minh Hue are sentenced to life imprisonment; The defendant Chu Van Nha was sentenced to 20 years in prison for embezzlement.
The trial will resume on 4.9.
[ad_2]
