Suggest that the Secretariat expel Mr. Tat Thanh Cang from the Party | Society

At the second meeting, the Central Inspection Committee considered and resolved the party discipline complaint in 3 cases and decided on other important issues.

Consequently, by considering reports suggesting disciplinary measures against party members; consider the content, nature, level and consequences of the violation; In accordance with the Party’s regulations on the discipline of Party members, the Central Inspection Committee proposed to the Secretariat to expel Mr. Tat Thanh Cang, former Under Secretary of the City Party Committee, from the Party.

The reason for the expulsion request is that while he was a member of the Party Central Committee, Permanent Deputy Secretary of the Ho Chi Minh City Party Committee, Mr. Cang seriously violated Party regulations and State laws on handling and use of state assets in Tan Thuan Industrial Development Company Limited (IPC) and Saigon South Development Joint Stock Company (SADECO).

Previously, the CSDT’s Ho Chi Minh City Police Department issued the conclusion of the investigation, transferred to the Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Civil Engineering to propose the prosecution of Mr. Tat Thanh Cang (former Undersecretary of the Ho Chi Minh City Party Standing Committee, period 2015-2020) and 18 others accused of “Violation of the rules on the management and use of state property causing useless losses”, “Corruption of property”, occurred at Public Development Company Limited. Tan Thuan Enterprise (IPC), Saigon South Development Joint Stock Company (SADECO) and related units.

Proposed investigative agency finding to prosecute Mr. Tat Thanh Cang for causing damages of VND 157 billion. Specifically, on May 16, 2017, Mr. Cang had a pen signing “Agreement” on the 1148-TTr Report of April 28, 2017 of the Ho Chi Minh City Party Committee, with the price of issue of shares determined at 40,000. VND / share for a strategic shareholder is incorrect according to the provisions of article 125 and point d, clause 2, article 149 of the Companies Law.

Mr. Tat Thanh Cang knew that the issuance of shares should be subject to auction and appraisal in accordance with Article 38 of Government Decree 91/2015, but did not order the Office of the City Party Committee, Representative of the Capital to issue opinions on the auction, price appraisal according to regulations.

According to the investigating agency, the conduct of Mr. Tat Thanh Cang has sufficient factors to constitute the crime of “Violation of the regulations on the management and use of State property, causing wasteful losses” …

Van kien