[ad_1]
“Is there a law that guarantees the security of the Constitution?”
“If we say that the Highway Intersection Law regulates two large areas, do we need to separate many Constitutions? Because the Constitution governs all the great fields. So, to explain this like this. it is not suitable, “said Mr. Nhuong.
The representative of the province of Ben Tre analyzed that road traffic is a specialized and specialized field. In addition to road traffic, we have water traffic, air traffic… “Now that we separate the Road Traffic Law, do we have to separate the laws in other areas later on? Or will we have our own laws to ensure the security of the Constitution? ”Mr. Nhung asked.
Mr. Nhuong also stated that the government report said that the behavior of people in traffic is one of the most important issues that constitute the content and concept of ensuring traffic safety.
“So if we are separated, it is no different than separating the child from the mother, transplanting the liver and transplanting the kidney,” admitted Mr. Nhuong.
Regarding the purpose of the construction of the law, Mr. Nhuong also said that “the most unreasonable” because 6 policies that the Government declared when constructing the Law to guarantee order and safety of road traffic are under the scope of the regulation. Road Traffic Law, do not belong to the issue of national security, crime prevention.
Increased administrative procedures, easy “boxing”
According to the deputy director of the Popular Volunteer Committee, the separation of the law will increase administrative procedures, will go against and not in line with the Party’s policy, the legal policy of reform of administrative procedures.
Mr. Nhuong is also concerned that the subsequent separation from the law will lead to “boxing, my right”, which the Prime Minister has repeatedly recalled.
“I believe that there is no basis for us to break the Road Traffic Law approved by the National Assembly in 2008 and we are implementing it, while it is considered that this law only has some problems to overcome.” Said Mr. Nhuc.
“I keep saying jokingly that if my wife and children treat my husband and children, if my grandparents cannot, do I have to move to another house to manage?” Pyong said and said, infrastructure and children people go together, no it is possible to separate.
Since then, the deputy head of the Popular Committee proposed to the National Assembly to reassign the Government to study this issue. “How to return the investigation file”, compared Mr. Nhuom, and at the same time he seriously suggested to the Ministry of Transport in the process of commenting and evaluating this issue because he has not seen that the transport sector has an opinion.
“I suggest that the police department assign the traffic police to the Ministry of Transportation, still guaranteeing the rights and benefits of the brothers to increase the handling of violations, it is more effective than separating the law,” he said. Pyongyang proposed.
“Separate laws to reduce traffic accidents, I am not convinced”
Also disagreeing with the separation of the Road Traffic Law into two laws, Delegate Truong Trong Nghia (Ho Chi Minh City) said that the ultimate purpose and soul of the Road Traffic Law is to create legal frameworks, the rules regulate human behavior to ensure safety.
“Therefore, I do not agree with the separation of the law,” Delegate Nghia said and suggested that if the Traffic Law is not working well, we will complement it well. “As for the reason for the separation of the law to reduce traffic accidents, I am not convinced,” he said.
“Also, aviation, waterways … are just as important. Who said that aviation safety is less important than road safety?” Nghia said and asked the National Assembly to focus on strengthening the Giao’s Law. road cleaning and other laws that modify, complete and do not separate this law.
[ad_2]
