[ad_1]
Nguyen Hai Nam after the trial – Photo: QD
The prosecution of District 1 is not under authority!
According to the content of the case, House 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem (Da Kao Ward, District 1) is owned by Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi.
In October 2017, Ms. Chi signed a contract to transfer the previous house to Ms. Hoang Thi Thu Thao. Ms. Chi received a 7 billion deposit from Ms. Thao and handed over the unfinished house to Ms. Thao.
During the construction process, Ms. Thao’s side had violations, so the Ho Chi Minh City Construction Department Inspector issued many sanction decisions and forced the owner of the project, Ms. Chi, to overcome the rape.
Ms. Chi authorized her cousin, Lam Hoang Tung, who also contributed capital to purchase the 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem house with Ms. Chi so that Tung could overcome the construction violation and complete the house.
On the afternoon of September 19, 2016, Mr. Lam Hoang Tung and Mr. Nguyen Hai Nam (Tung’s friend) came to the house and asked everyone to come out of the house and take 3 children out of the house. house to dismantle the offensive construction.
Subsequently, Ms. Thao sent a petition to the authorities to report the incident. On the night of October 1, 2016, the District 1 police prosecuted the defendants and arrested Mr. Nam and Mr. Tung.
Mr. Nguyen Hai Nam cried and apologized to his father – Video: TET HOLIDAY
According to the Panel, regarding the procedural decision of the District 1 Police Police Department, the District 1 Civil Engineering Institute prosecuting the accused is not under the authority because the accused Nguyen Hai Nam is a judge.
However, after that, the District 1 Police Department and the District 1 People’s Police Institute transferred the case file to the Ho Chi Minh City Police Department. The files have been transferred for investigation in accordance with their competence.
The procedures of the Ho Chi Minh City Police CSDT Office and the Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Civil Engineering have been correctly applied.
VKS prosecutes the right person, the right crime
Regarding the actions of the accused, the Panel considers that the accused plead innocent, but in addition to the testimonies of the accused, there are also the statements of the victims, videos … so there is sufficient basis to identify the crimes accused. violate other people’s accommodation.
Specifically, on September 19, 2019, the defendants Tung and Nam went to the home of 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem to evict relatives from the home and remove the children. According to the Group, cThe defendant took the children, but Ms. Thao’s relatives prevented him from doing so, so he was unable to carry him.
According to the provisions of the Residency Law, legal residences include houses owned or leased, loaned or authorized to stay. However, in case the citizen’s place of residence cannot be determined, the citizen’s place of residence is the place of residence.
Based on the house purchase contract between Ms. Chi and Ms. Thao, Ms. Chi handed the house over to Ms. Thao to take over, Ms. Thao made a deposit of 7 billion. According to local police, Ms Thao has been living in the house since March 2019.
The Panel believes that the VKS prosecutes defendants for offenses of infringing other people’s accommodation. HThe behavior of the accused is so severe that it requires severe punishment. However, defendants who committed crimes for the first time have good personalities, so the Panel considers the number of photographs.
The defendant Lam Hoang Tung was shocked when he was taken to the detention center – Photo: Q.Đ.
Split compensation in another case
In the case, Ms. Thao asked for 520 million dong of money for home repairs, 180 million for lost cash, 130 million for 1 pair of earrings, 400 million for clothing, shoes, and 2.5 billion dong of value. 8 watches.
The Panel said During the investigation, the victim has not provided evidence to prove the damage. The defendant is absent from the court hearing, but the rights of the victim are still reserved. The Panel separates the compensation in another case, obtaining the right to sue the victim.
Since then, the Group has sentenced the defendant Lam Hoang Tung to 2 years in prison and the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam to 1 year and 5 months for infringing on the other person’s residence.
After the court’s sentencing, the defendant Tung fainted on the spot, while the defendant Nam kept shouting “I am innocent.” Mr. Nam kept crying to his father: “Dad, I’m sorry. I’m innocent, I understand you.”
