Seizing and intercepting relief money, has it been handled by law? | News



[ad_1]

Currently, the H. Krong No Police (Dak Nong Province) is cooperating with the Criminal Police Department of the Dak Nong Province Police to investigate a person who has stolen money from Rao Trang’s family 3 (Thua Thien – Hue). ).

Ms. Le Thi Thu Thao (24, Nam Nung Commune, H. Krong No, Dak Nong) said she went to H. Krong No Police to report being misled by the bad guys, allocating money for support and rescue support in mind.

Ms. Thao is the wife of Mr. Tran Van L. (25, living in Nam Nung commune), one of two people who died in the Rao Trang 3 hydropower incident (Thua Thien – Hue) was found first.

According to Ms Thao, on October 20, a man called to ask and offer condolences to Thao’s family, the man on the other end of the line sent a message with a link and asked him to enter information for Send money in support for.

As she mourned her husband’s death, Thao paid no attention and followed the other man’s instructions. Unexpectedly, after a few minutes, Thao lost 100 million dong on his account.

Can be handled criminally

Regarding acts of appropriation and interception of relief money from victims of natural disasters and floods, many jurists affirmed that it is a strictly prohibited act and that it will be handled.

According to lawyer Bui Quoc Tuan (Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association), to further enhance the history of the volunteers, attention will also be paid to the public and transparent use of money. Otherwise, the people involved are likely to have legal trouble.

Specifically, lawyer Tuan said that the appropriation of relief money and goods could be fined from VND 5,000,000 to VND 10,000,000, in accordance with the provisions of point c, clause 1 and clause 2, article 8 of the Decree. 144/2013 / ND-CP. At the same time, the remedy is to force the return of the illegal profits obtained by carrying out acts of violation.

In addition, lawyer Tuan also said that depending on the nature and scope of the act of appropriation, the handling will be different, for example, the purpose of calling, mobilizing money, goods … for individuals, then to appropriate After all, such acts can be committed in the “crime of fraud and appropriation of property”, as defined in article 174 of the Penal Code of 2015, modified and supplemented in 2017, with the maximum penalty of 20 to life imprisonment. .

Similarly, with the act of intercepting relief money, lawyer Nguyen Minh Canh (Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association) said that if the money for the block is 2 million VND or more, the appropriator can be treated for appropriation of property ”.

Attorney Canh said property seizure is a criminal who publicly seizes property in the presence of the property owner or manager without resorting to force or any other means of threat. Threats or intimidation to appropriate property that negatively affect social order and safety can be prosecuted for criminal liability.



[ad_2]