[ad_1]
Previously, the People’s Court of District 5 scheduled the trial for yesterday 31.3, but postponed it, because the plaintiff’s representative has requested to postpone the trial.
According to Mr. Nguyen Phuong Du’s request, in early September 2018, when he bought a case of Saigon red beer to drink, he had to open a beer bottle with only about half the amount of beer water and had a strong smell.
Later, Mr. Du also discovered a beer bottle with its cap intact, with its seal intact, but within only 1/3 of the liquid. Therefore, Mr. Du kept this bottle as evidence. After that, Mr. Du reported the incident to Sabeco. However, more than half a month later, on September 26, 2018, the Sabeco representative just met with Du to record the incident.
Force Sabeco to publish a public apology to Mr. Nguyen Phuong Du as a consumer, in 3 consecutive issues, with four newspapers.
Sabeco proposed to suspend the caseDuring the acceptance process of the case, the People’s Court of District 5 invited the parties to mediate. Accordingly, Mr. Du upheld his claim request, demanding that Sabeco have to settle $ 1 million. The representative of Sabeco did not accept Mr. Du’s request and asked the 5th District People’s Court to temporarily suspend the case, transfer the file to the CSDT to investigate and clarify Mr. Du’s motives and purposes. In addition, according to the case file, the 5th District People’s Court has issued a decision to request experience for the exported Sai Gon beer bottle, whether it is a Sabeco product or not. Consequently, the Ho Chi Minh City Sub-Institute of Criminal Sciences conducted an evaluation and concluded that the classes printed on the beer bottle label were examined, compared to the classes printed on the label of a beer bottle. Similar beer (presented by Sabeco), not printed from the same print copy. |
[ad_2]