[ad_1]
The WHO research team held a press conference (Photo: AP)
WHO delegation: agreed on the content of the report.
The New York Times (NYT) reported on February 14, sharing in an interview the same day, Dr. Peter Daszak, a member of the WHO think tank who went to China to trace the origin of the Covid-19 epidemic , for It It is known that the SARS-CoV-2 virus can initially originate in bats in South China and Southeast Asia, and then spread to the South China (Wuhan) seafood market.
This is a “conscious” approach, he emphasized. Viruses carried by bats infect wildlife on the farm, employees or animals such as ferrets, badgers, canine badgers, and civets on the farm can become infected.
The animals were then transported to markets such as the Wuhan Seafood Market in southern China or farm workers infected with the virus, which could cause the virus to spread more widely.
WHO expert team visited China to investigate (Image: Reuters)
In addition, Mr. Daszak claimed, most members of the expert group denied that the SARS-CoV-2 hypothesis originated in the laboratory. This is a possibility that is not worth investigating further, says the expert.
Furthermore, according to China Daily, the leader of the WHO research team, Peter Ben Embarek, said on 2/15 that the expert group had agreed on a summary report on the traceability of the SARS-CoV virus. -2 and you will complete the report in the next few days.
He emphasized that the focus of this report is that the group of experts has reached a consensus on the results of the investigation, the conclusions of the investigation and the future directions of the investigation, in no case does this part affect the results of the other’s comment. part.
WHO experts praise China
Earlier, on February 12, the NYT published an article titled “China Refuses to Provide Important Data in WHO Investigation,” stating that China is refusing to provide input data. At the time of the initial outbreak, making it difficult for WHO experts to work before reaching China, it sparked mixed controversies.
However, the next day, February 13, Dr. Daszak shared the opinion on his personal Twitter account, refuting the NYT information. He said: “This is not the experience I have while doing the WHO mission. As the head of the working group on animals and the environment, I think my Chinese colleagues are down to earth and trustworthy. We have obtained important new data (during the research) and we have also learned much more about the route of the virus.“.
Thea K Fischer, another member of the investigation team, also said that the NYT report severely distorted her statements. Those were not the experiences he had on the epidemiological team, he said. “The Chinese side and the international epidemiological team have built a good relationship. (Our) vigorous discussions also reflect a high level of participation (from the Chinese side). We are severely distorted, overshadowing important scientific work.”
[ad_2]
