[ad_1]
This afternoon, August 31, the Hanoi City People’s Court continued to open a trial to hear the defendant Do Ngoc Anh (SN 1964, resident of Lien Ha commune, Dong Anh, Hanoi) on the crime of murder as prescribed in Clause 1, Article 123. Penal Code. Do Ngoc Anh is a suspect who murdered his wife, Ms. Dang Thi Hai, owner of a chain of motels in Xuan Mai city, Chuong My district, and then cut up the body, without mourning, causing a stir a year ago.
Continue updating, …
16h30, The representatives of the city of Hanoi VKS proposed to the court to send the death sentence to the defendant Do Ngoc Anh for the murder.
The panel asked the defendant, the defendant Ngoc Anh opposed the entire impeachment of the VKS for him. The defendant’s attorney requests the Panel to return the additional investigation file.
Defendant’s defense offers to return the additional investigation file
3:50 pm, The Panel ends the questions section, goes to the arguments section.
3:45 pmThe lawyer who defended the legal rights and interests of the accused asked Ngo Thu Huong, the victim’s daughter. Ms. Huong said that Ngoc Anh had planned to kill her mother before, before the crime, the defendant also called her to ask if she was home or not.
Ms. Huong added that after her mother had an accident, she checked and found that her mother’s money was no longer available. Normally her mother used cash, on that occasion when the new year rolled around, she had just gotten the rent, so she definitely had cash in the house but couldn’t find it. She hopes that the Panel will remove the defendant Ngoc Anh from society permanently.
15:05, The defendant’s attorney asked the defendant, saying that the prosecution has clearly established the defendant’s criminal acts, why so far the defendant still sincerely refuses to do so?
The defendant Ngoc Anh still said that he was beaten, so he limited himself to giving the investigator’s opinion. The defendant testified in court as husband and wife, who were also angry with each other, for which he beat his wife. However, only strike to warn, but do not intentionally strike for consequences.
Lawyer at the hearing
The defense attorney for the defendant requests the defendant to testify sincerely to receive the leniency of the law. Ngoc Anh confessed that the defendant was beaten and forced when he was arrested, for which he gave a false statement.
The panel asked Ngoc Anh if the defendant brought home the knife that was used to excrete the victim using a wood scrubbing machine. The defendant replied that it was an incorrect testimony and the defendant was forced to give a false statement.
2:45 pm, The panel asked defendant Ngoc Anh about the victim’s bloodstains and the defendant went round and round. The court asked Ngoc Anh to answer honestly because if she was stubborn, the sanction would not be considered to mitigate her.
The court asked the defendant Ngoc Anh what he thought of the testimony from morning until now, Ngoc Anh said: “All samples in the vehicle from the date of the incident to the date of the arrest in the vehicle were empty. Since the day of the arrest and detention of that vehicle, the accused has not driven it, so he does not know where the specimen came from. The accused has no sin but must repent”.
Summary of the trial on the afternoon of August 31
2:40 pm, Defendant Ngoc Anh testified in court that he struck the victim’s forehead with his hand and then bled his forehead.
The court asked the defendant if he felt any responsibility when using the iron bar to hit the victim’s forehead, Ngoc Anh replied that it was a matter of husband and wife, so it was inevitable, the light blow made the injury was insignificant.
The victim’s elderly mother collapsed in court
14h35The panel asked Mr. Ngo Duy Hiep: his son was injured. Due to Mr. Hiep’s hearing loss, the court agrees to have an interpreter sit in court to help communicate his ideas.
Before the panel, Mr. Hiep said that because he was deaf and mute, he did not speak with the defendant Ngoc Anh, nor did he have any conflict with this person.
Mr. Ngo Duy Hiep – the victim’s son responded to the panel
2:20 pm, The trial started, the panel asked Ms Ngo Thu Huong, the victim’s daughter, to see if she could understand the content of this morning’s trial. Ms. Huong said that she has captured all the content.
“I cannot imagine a person doing so much cruelty, causing consequences for the family. So far, I have not yet found my mother’s body to be buried according to custom. This pain will follow us for life.
In this trial, the defendant Ngoc Anh has no regrets, my family will continue to find my mother. I ask the court to remove this person from society forever, he does not deserve to live in this society. I ask the accused to acknowledge my behavior, offer compensation for my family“- said Huong.
Ms. Thao, the biological mother of the victim, was also at the trial. Before the panel, Ms. Thao said: “I have a daughter, Ngoc Anh just found out who killed my son, not knowing how to kill. I suggest how this British court kills my son, I have to do with him as well”.
The victim’s mother was frustrated by the crimes of the defendant Ngoc Anh
14h00, The defendant Do Ngoc Anh was taken to the courtroom. Below, the victim’s family wears a funeral kerchief and brings the victim’s photo to court. They expect the perpetrators of crimes to be duly punished.
The defendant Do Ngoc Anh at the trial on the afternoon of August 31
Relatives of the victim holding a photo at the trial.
In the morning session of the same day, the defendant Do Ngoc Anh denied all previous testimonies, claiming that the accusation and the accusations of the VKS and the defendant’s earlier testimony were due to the defendant being investigated. beat, force the bow.
Summary of the morning session of August 31
The Panel continued to extract a paragraph from the profile detailing the logging process and the reason why Ngoc Anh cut off his body. But then, Ngoc Anh still insisted that, being compelled by the investigating officer, he had to testify to avoid being beaten.
In response to the investigative agency, the biological body of the human body was found in the car of the defendant Do Ngoc Anh. Test results showed that the DNA sample was found to match the victim’s mother. The defendant said that he did not transport Ms. Hai to the car, so it is not correct to discover the biological organization of the human body in the defendant’s vehicle.
According to the accusations, in 2016, Do Ngoc Anh’s wife died. At the end of 2017, Ngoc Anh met Ms. Dang Thi H. on the social network Facebook. After a while of talking, the two fell in love.
They both agreed, Ngoc Anh will authorize Ms H. to have full authority to manage, use, rent, gift or sell the Parado car for 1.5 billion VND. In return, Ms. H. will carry out the authorization procedures, change the name from Ngoc Anh to Ms. H.’s 60 m2 plot of land in Xuan Mai City, Chuong My District, Hanoi, for Ngoc Anh to invest and build houses.
On April 2, 2018, Ngoc Anh and Ms H. registered their marriage, the two parties signed a written agreement, if someone cheated, they must compensate the other person with the amount of 1.5 billion VND.
However, less than 3 months after the marriage registration date, Mrs. H. suspects that Ngoc Anh has an illegal relationship with another woman, so she voluntarily sold the car and did not carry out the procedure to change the name of the land. . to Ngoc Anh. From there, it leads to a money conflict between the two of you. Ngoc Anh went to live in his own home in Dong Anh district.
This man repeatedly texted and called asking Ms. H. to complete the procedure to change the land name for him or pay for the car sale, but Ms. H. disagreed. Exasperated by this, the defendant considered breaking into the house to beat Ms. H. out of annoyance and then demand payment.
On the morning of January 31, 2019, the defendant broke into Ms H.’s home and waited. When Ms. H. woke up and went out into the garden, Ngoc Anh threatened her. The victim asked, promised to return the money to sell the car, but Ngoc Anh didn’t believe it and said “You cheated on me, I really hurt you.” As she spoke, Ngoc Anh picked up a metal bar from the ground and attacked Ms. H., causing the victim to remain motionless.
The defendant then tripped the circuit breaker, the purpose of which the camera could not record images. While walking towards Ms. H.’s house, Ngoc Anh was surprised to see Mr. Ngo Duy Hiep (a son of Ms. H., born deaf and dumb).
Ngoc Anh pretended to ask Hiep if he knew where Ms. H. was going to distract him. After the murder, Ngoc Anh hid Ms. H.’s body in her room and left. Waiting until 22:00 on the same day, Ngoc Anh returned to Ms. H.’s house with a knife and drove her car to destroy it.
Upon arrival, Ngoc Anh used the keys obtained earlier to enter the house. The defendant used 4-5 sheets to roll Ms. H.’s body in the car and then clean up the bloodstains at the scene. After that, Ngoc Anh drove the car to take the body to the Dong Tru Bridge (across the Duong River).
Here the subject of the murder of Mrs. H. made many parts and threw them into the non-tang river. After burning the articles of crime to conceal her behavior, Ngoc Anh returned home to shower and sleep.
The next day, the subject was summoned by the Chuong My District Police investigating agency to verify the disappearance of Ms. H. 2 days later, the subject wrote a petition to confess and confessed to the act of killing, without regretting his body .
[ad_2]
