[ad_1]
Intellectual people
The Government Inspector has just made public a series of errors in the construction project of the Nhon City Railway – Hanoi Station; At the same time, it is confirmed that many complaints are well founded.
Shortcomings and shortcomings arose after its deployment
The Government Inspectorate has just announced the completion of the inspection according to the request for a complaint of some contents of the Nhon – Hanoi railway station project, in the joint contract for the project execution consulting services. Immediately after being deployed, there were shortcomings, deficiencies and irrationalities that raised issues between the parties (Hanoi Urban Railway Management Board, Systra Consulting, Vietnamese Male authorities and other related entities).
In the package contract content, there were deficiencies, a lot of unclear content, which led to a different understanding between the parties, in addition to understanding the meaning of the content between the Vietnamese version and the English version of the parties. there are certain differences.
The first large-scale, complex project to apply new technologies and foreign standards to Vietnam, but a 25-month definitive spending contract, with a total value of more than 10.6 million euros, is not possible. It is difficult to fully meet and anticipate the requirements in the implementation of this special project.
Nhon City Railway – Hanoi Train Station (Photo: Toan Vu).
Some adjustments increase the contract value, but do not increase the tasks, but mainly due to the long delay in the implementation of the Systra tasks compared to the progress of the original package contract. For objective and subjective reasons, Systra Consulting must mobilize staff and costs for a long time, leading to increased costs.
On the other hand, in the process of negotiating the adjustment of the consulting contract (package contract), the investor does not clarify the responsibility of Systra Consultants for delaying the determination and reduction of costs when preparing estimates of additional costs.
The Government Inspectorate affirms responsibility under the leadership of the Hanoi Urban Railway Management Board through terms, affiliated units and related collectives and individuals; Agencies, organizations and relevant consulting units mentioned above and the Departments of: Planning, Planning and Architectural Investments.
There are signs of violation of the law.
“The implementation of the package for the removal of bombs, mines, explosives from the viaduct section and storage area of the contractor Lung Lo Construction Corporation shows signs of violation of the law.” the conclusion is clear.
In fact, at the time of the inspection, the acceptance and settlement works have not been completed, for objective and subjective reasons. Where the main reason is the unsecured volume acceptance record, there are indications of incorrect build volume; The completion documents are not in accordance with the regulations, there are phenomena that are not in accordance with reality and are not in accordance with the approved technical plan …
To keep up with the project’s construction schedule, the Hanoi Urban Railway Management Board has sent a document to the Ministry of National Defense. The Ministry of Defense has issued a document to the High Command of the Industry for its implementation.
The Engineering High Command and Lung Lo Construction Corporation issued a written commitment to safety and handed over the site to contractors for the construction of the reservoir package and viaduct package.
However, the inspection agency confirmed that the written security commitment and the acceptance of the volume for settlement are two different contents.
These violations violated Resolution No. 95/2003 of the Minister of Defense on the promulgation of the technical process for the detection and handling of bombs, mines and explosives. Responsibility belongs to the leadership of the Hanoi Urban Railways Board of Directors for periods; Industry Command: The executing agency of the contractor, Lung Lo Construction Corporation, and the construction unit of this package.
Mr. Luong Xuan Binh, former deputy director of the Hanoi Urban Railway Management Board, has denounced the errors in the urban railway project for many years (Photo: Duc Minh).
Risk of damage to the state budget
Regarding the complaint of Mr. Luong Xuan Binh – former deputy director of the Hanoi Urban Railways Management Board, the Government Inspector confirmed: Content of denouncing the selection of the contractor for package 1, the previous section There is evidence of a great violation of the law.
According to Document No. 629 / BC-KHĐT dated June 28, 2013 of the Hanoi Planning and Investment Department, the evaluation between Systra Consultant and the investor is not consistent, there is no transparency, it is not properly implemented. Provisions of the law on bids, selection of contractors in accordance with the Law on Bids.
On October 18, 2013, the Hanoi Urban Railways Management Board met with the Ciencol-Lotte Joint Venture to clarify the content set forth in the petition. At the meeting, the consortium respected the results of the bid evaluation of Systra Consultant and the Hanoi Urban Railway Management Board. Result The contractor Dealim won the tender with an offer of 65,252,970 euros.
“The infractions in the tender were pointed out by the Department of Planning and Investments in Document No. 629, in violation of article 29 of the Tender Law and article 18 of Government Decree No. 85/2009 that guides the implementation of the Law of Tenders. and select the construction contractor “– emphasized the Government Inspector.
The conclusion of the inspection also said that the complaint of the contractor’s selection to implement package 3, the tunnel and the underground stations showing signs of violation of the law is reasonable. The Contractor and the Hanoi Urban Railway Project Management Board signed the contract to build Package 3 when clean land was not available and it was handed over to the contractor for construction.
The Contractor proposes to add the cost to the contract price based on the “Preliminary Construction Plan” that has been developed at the time of delivery of the workplace and has been authenticated. However, at the time of inspection, the site has not been fully delivered. Currently, the terrain of stations 9,10,11 is adjusted to planning, the site cannot be cleared, which generates a lack of space to deliver to the contractor during this period.
“The delay in the delivery of the site to the construction contractor under the contract, leads the contractor to adjust the execution plan in accordance with the signed contract, so the contractor requested an additional budget for this around 40 million dollars, the risk of damage to the state budget “– Conclusion information.
The Government Inspector has just published the conclusion that the complaint of the selection of a contractor for the implementation of package 6 in the rail system 1 shows signs of violation of the law is insufficient, because it is a package. There are complicated bidding situations, the bid price exceeds the approved bid package price.
Furthermore, according to the protocol, only tenderers of French origin can participate in the tender, leading to only one consortium of contractors participating and winning the pre-qualification, which is the Alstom-Colas-Thales contractors association. When a bidding situation arises, the investor has consulted in writing at all levels and sectors, such as the Hanoi Planning and Investment Department, the City People’s Committee and the Procurement Management Department (Ministry of Planning and Investment) . .
The Kha
