[ad_1]
A senior VKSND representative in Hanoi suggested canceling all first instance trials for re-investigation after questioning defendants, crime victims and witnesses – Photo: TIEN THANG
According to the representative of the Popular Prosecutor’s Office (VKSND), after examining the testimonies of the accused, crime victims, witnesses and related persons in the appeal trial on May 11, the high-level VKSND in Hanoi The Panel Conference Trial (HDXX) canceled all first instance sentences, returned the case file of the husband and wife of Lam Quyet Co., Ltd. to re-investigate and clarify the contradictions in the case.
In court, the Panel also handed over the defendants Lay and directly confronted the victim, Mr. and Mrs. Do Van Toi.
The two defendants insisted on returning 900 million dong to Mr. Toi. However, the receipt to demonstrate that it was lost after Tang “Nhue” sent troops to illegally occupy the company’s headquarters.
Toi, meanwhile, maintains that he has not been paid, and this can be proven by 42 messages he had sent to Defendant Pham and about the loan agreement.
However, đThe defendant denied this because the messages did not specify the amount of the debt and the loan contract expired.
In the debate, the representative of the high-level VNDND in Hanoi said that the investigative process and the Court of First Instance Court of Trial and Appeal today were unable to clarify conflicts between the accused and the victims. Much of the content on the mortgage car, Toyota Camry documents are not shown in the records or at trial.
A senior VKSND representative said that at the appeal hearing, the testimony of Nguyen Xuan Duong (ie, 49-year-old Duong “Nhue”, a resident of Ky Ba District, Thai Binh City) and witnesses showed Duong “Nhue”. violating Lam Quyet Co., Ltd.
This is also the basis for Mr. and Mrs. Xuan to file a complaint when they are accused of breach of trust and appropriation of property.
The VKSND high-level representative suggested that the Appeals Panel should cancel all first instance trials and return the files for further investigation to ensure objectivity and accuracy.
Nguyen Xuan Duong admitted many times at the Lam Quyet Company headquarters to “protect” assets – Photo: TIEN THANG
In court, Duong “Nhue” admitted many times at Lam Quyet headquarters after his wife Nguyen Thi Duong told him that Mr. and his wife are no longer present in this company, and said that I came to the Lam Quyet company to “protect” the assets within this company because many other creditors wanted to take them away.
Before the question asked about “protecting” the Lam Quyet company, either to inform the local government or to register for temporary residence and obtain the consent of Mr. and his wife, Mr. Nguyen Xuan Duong said when he got there . He informed the local authorities, but did not register for the temporary residence, and although there was a phone, Mr. Li did not agree to “protect”.
“My house, I am in a legal place and I do not let anyone come, should I go? If I still try to enter and people lose something, will I doubt them or not?” – Asked the representative of VKS.
Nguyen Xuan Duong did not answer this question, but still thought he was not wrong.
The appeals court in the “breach of trust and property grab” case involving the owner of Lam Quyet Co., Ltd. is still ongoing with the defense of the attorneys before the Panel of Judges.
Youth online will continue updating …
