[ad_1]
On December 11, the Central Military Court continued to appeal 7 defendants in the case of allocation of defense lands under the Military Service of the Navy (QCHQ) to the private sector that occurred in Ho Chi Minh City.
Among the appellants were Nguyen Van Hien, former admiral, QCHQ commander, deputy minister of National Defense; Bui Nhu Thi – Colonel, former Head of the Economic Division of Military Administration; Bui Van Nga – Colonel, Former Director of Hai Thanh Island Tourist and Service Company Limited; Doan Manh Thao – Colonel, former Head of the Financial Division, QCHQ; Tran Trong Tuan – Colonel, Former Deputy Director of Hai Thanh Company; Dinh Ngoc System: Former Lieutenant Colonel, Deputy General of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense; Pham Van Diet (SN 1972) – Managing Director of Duc Binh Group Joint Stock Company, Deputy Director of Yen Khanh Company.
Among them, former Deputy Minister Nguyen Van Hien and most of the defendants called for mitigation of the punishment, alleged the defendant Dinh Ngoc System.
Defendant Nguyen Van Hien.
In court, the presiding judge said that the defendant Bui Nhu Thi was absent for health reasons and announced his appeal showing that he requested mitigation because he committed a crime while fulfilling the duties assigned by his superiors.
Speaking of the resolution of the case, the representative of the Central Military Prosecutor’s Office said that the defendant’s lawyer, Nguyen Van Hien, has presented some new documents that can serve as a basis for mitigation. Many cadres, soldiers and individuals also asked Mr. Hien to ease his punishment.
“Compared to other defendants, the defendant Nguyen Van Hien has made more contributions to the army and the Fatherland. The accused was recognized by the Party, the State and the ministries and was awarded many medals … Therefore, I suggest applying the above circumstances to partially reduce the sentence for the accused ”- said the prosecutor.
With Mr. Bui Nhu Thi’s appeal, the prosecutor said that the defendant knew about the crime, the repentance, many illnesses … so the punishment could also be mitigated.
Case appeal panel.
For the defendant Dinh Ngoc System, the prosecution representative said, the defendant said he did not commit a crime, has nothing to do with Yen Khanh Company and blamed all charges on the defendant Diet and his nephew Vu Thi Hoan. – Director of the company Yen Khanh.
However, the prosecutor asserts that there is sufficient grounds to conclude that defendant System is the mastermind in the act of cheating, seizing ownership of the land use rights No. 7-9 from the QCHQ on Ton Duc Thang Street (HCMC). . The judgment of first instance concludes that the defendant is founded, without grounds to accept the defendant’s appeal.
In addition, the prosecutor also asked the court to reject the appeal of the Tran Trong Tuan group, Doan Manh Thao and Bui Van Nga; Do not allow defendants Nguyen Van Hien and Bui Nhu Thi to enjoy suspended sentences.
In civil terms, land number 7-9 was mortgaged by Dinh Ngoc Gen at the BIDV bank, but the first instance judgment was returned to QCHD. The BIDV appealed this and said that the lower court declared the loan contract with the guarantee that land number 7-9 was not valid.
The representative of the prosecution in the appeal session asked the court to accept part of the BIDV appeal, allowing the banks to recover the debts of the companies that borrowed money through a guarantee that is parcel 7-9.
[ad_2]
