[ad_1]
In the afternoon from 13 to 5, the People’s Court of Hoa Binh province continued to listen to 15 defendants in this case of exam fraud in this town. The test panel focused on clarifying the acts of giving and receiving bribes to increase points for candidates.
The father denied the rating.
In court, Mr. Ho Chuc (former teacher at Thanh Ha High School, Lac Thuy District) Khai has a colleague relationship with Do Manh Tuan (former deputy director of the ethnic minority boarding school in the Lac Thuy district).
On June 20, 2018, the two sides met, Mr. Chuc asked the question, “There are two grandchildren this year attending the national high school exam, do you see help?”
Then, Mr. Tuan asked Mr. Chuc to provide the full names and registration numbers of the two candidates that Mr. Chuc asked him to raise the score to be N.H.H.Đ. and T.T.G., and students from Thanh Ha High School. As a result of Mr. Tuan’s intervention, these two contestants were raised 18.8 and 14.95 respectively.
Dark 11-7, after the exam results, Ms. Ha Thi Thuy Lieu and Tran Thi Lien (parents of the two contestants) arrived at Chuc’s house, thanks to the money transfer to thank Mr. Tuan, but they did not say how much. .
Called for questioning, Mr. Tuan acknowledged the behavior.
The exam fraud test panel in Hoa Binh – Photo: DANH TRONG
Contrary to the testimony of Mr. Chuc, quoted in court, Ms. Tran Thi Lien, the contestant’s mother Đ.T.G., denied everything.
Ms. Lien stated that she did not ask Mr. Chuc to increase the score, but only thanks to the results of the Ministry of Education and Training, was she able to see the help and no material promise. It was not until later that the police announced that they had learned that their son had grown by 14.95 points.
In particular, although Ms. Lien insisted that she did not know what position Chuc held on the examination board, Ms. Lien said that she was still confident that he would see the points.
The jury asked why no one would get a higher score for someone else’s score. Ms. Lien said, “I asked my son to do the homework, he said he could do it to make him believe.”
The test panel continued to ask, “Do you know that your child has been raised to 14.75 points?” Ms. Lien continued to answer “I don’t know.” I do not agree with the answer of this father, the jury He asked Ms. Lien to tell the truth to others so that she could “listen”.
Similarly, Ms. Ha Thi Thuy Lieu, candidate mother N.H.H.Đ., also disagreed with Ho Chuc’s testimony.
Mrs. Lieu said that she had a colleague relationship with Mr. Chuc when he taught at the same school. Ms. Lieu acknowledged asking for help, but the mother said that she did not give Mr. Chuc’s information about her son.
The test panel asked: Why not give your son’s information that Chuc knows he should pass to Do Manh Tuan, to repair the test and improve the score? She gave an amazing “don’t know” answer.
Ms. Liu also denied that on 9/11 at Mr. Chuc’s house to give money. The jury asked other questions, but she answered “not knowing” and “not remembering”.
Hearing this, the test panel allowed him to return because “there were no more words to say.”
‘My son got a grade ‘
Tran Thuy Phuong, the next father, was called to question, in court, the father said, “My family has no need to accumulate points, buy points, ask for points or anything.”
“The LPN contestant is my son, he received a qualification update. On March 30, he received a phone from the evidence room and the result of the report was high, not an increase in qualifications” – said Ms. Phuong.
“On October 22, I heard that Ms. Le Thi Hong (former Principal of Hoang Van Thu High School) received information on how to raise my son’s grades. My husband called Ms. Hong when he said he was a person I took the information to improve the score, so my wife and I were very upset.
It bothered me when the party had been disciplined by the government, morale was ruined, and the family had been insulted. I suggested collecting evidence and returning honor to my family soon because my family did not need to buy points, run points, increase points, see points, “added Ms. Phuong.
In court, Ms. Phuong also suggested that she soon answer the question of who raised the score for her son, raised the wrong grade, or for what purpose. “if I do, the person will accept it, “he emphasized.
