[ad_1]
Intellectual people
Responding to the lawyer’s question, Mr. Nguyen Thanh Tai stated that the defendant’s main objective in leading the project is to accelerate the project, complete the tasks, for the general purpose of Ho Chi Minh City.
On the morning of September 17, at the trial of the defendant Nguyen Thanh Tai (former vice chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee) and his accomplices, the lawyers questioned 4 defendants and related parties to clarify many questions about the owner . project implementation on the house and residential lot at 8-12 Le Duan Street, District 1, HCMC.
In particular, defense attorney Nguyen Thanh Tai posed many questions to the representatives of the Steering Committee for the reorganization and management of state-owned real estate in Ho Chi Minh City (Steering Committee 09).
This entity comes to court as an organization with related rights and obligations. The lawyer said that in 2007, the Steering Committee 09 sent an official letter to propose the policy of building a project in the house area, 8-12 Le Duan, assigned the house business management company to implement the project , looking for a partner. cooperate.
According to the lawyer, the Steering Committee is the first agency to issue a policy on the auction of the house and land. Winning bidders will have the right to cooperate with the project builder’s business management company. Due to the previous opinion, the representative of Steering Committee 09 did not object.
The representative said that all matters related to Steering Committee 09 are clearly shown in documents and files. According to the documents, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce sends a document to the People’s Committee of Ho Chi Minh City to request the government of Ho Chi Minh City to create the conditions to support 4 companies directly dependent on this ministry so that purchase the designation or long-term lease of 8-12 Le Duan homes and land. After that, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee approved appointing Hon Ngoc Vien Dong Joint Stock Company as the project investor, based on a joint venture with other companies.
In almost all the questions posed by the lawyer, the representative of the Steering Committee 09 stated that all the contents were clearly displayed in the documents issued in accordance with the regulations. Lawyers can consult the advisory documents, proposals of departments and agencies, specialized units that perform tasks related to the previous project.
Mr. Nguyen Thanh Tai claimed to do everything for the common purpose. (Photo: Pham Nguyen).
Next, the lawyers asked the appraisal agency to clarify the damage in the case. Representatives of the appraisal agency said that according to the appraisal request of the investigating police agency of the Ministry of Public Security, the investigating agency has determined the damage at the time the case occurs and at the time of the prosecution of the case. The appraisal council said it relied on many factors to determine harm in the case. At the same time, it is determined that this agency has performed an appraisal in accordance with the law.
After questioning the persons involved, Mr. Nguyen Thanh Tai’s defense attorney proceeded to question the client.
“During the implementation of the project, I did not receive advice on whether my decision was wrong. All my decisions were communicated in writing to the chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee, the Ho Chi Minh City Standing People’s Committee and other departments. for the common good, not under the pressure of politics, “admitted Mr. Nguyen Thanh Tai.
Furthermore, Mr. Tai stated that the defendant’s main objective in managing the project is to accelerate the project and complete the task. Mr. Tai believes that he is following the policy.
Since the defendant Nguyen Thanh Tai’s health is not guaranteed to continue the interrogation, the lawyer asked the defendant Thuy. Once again, Ms. Thuy stated that the relationship between her and Mr. Tai is just a leadership relationship with a business owner. Regarding the relationship between Ms. Thuy and Mr. Tai, Ms. Thuy said that her family also has someone working in the state, so she knows Mr. Tai. Ms. Thuy emphasized that this is a colleague relationship.
On the side of the defendant Dao Anh Kiet, the defendant Kiet stated, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment is not responsible for organizing and disposing of public property. The former director of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment affirms that this responsibility corresponds to the housing management and trading company.
The trial continued to question.
Xuan Duy
