[ad_1]
On December 18, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court continued to defend the defendant’s rape on the Trung Luong – Ho Chi Minh City highway.
After the defense attorneys, Mr. Dinh La Thang (former Minister of Transport) appeared in court to protect himself. In self-defense, Mr. Thang said: “I reject the accusation of VKS, because it is an accusation from heaven, shooting, setting people’s hands on fire. Absolutely unfounded, illegal, emotionless.”
Mr. Dinh La Thang was escorted to trial. Photo: HOANG GIANG
Mr. Thang said that VKS “brought buffalo scalpel, cut chicken blood,” incorrectly applied the law to charge the crime. This is an auction case where VKS makes legal provisions on the tender. “The person who obeys the law is wrongly attributed,” Thang said.
He admitted that he was responsible as head of the trucking industry for allowing the case to happen. However, he denied criminal responsibility.
Mr. Thang analyzed when the Minister was assigned by fields to the vice ministers. He did not directly assign Cuu Long Corporation. Although the accusation of accusation is the direct one, it is completely absent.
In addition, he also denied having influenced the people involved in the project. “In this court, from former Vice Minister Nguyen Hong Truong down, everyone said that I had not affected them,” Thang recalled.
Concerning the relationship with the defendant Dinh Ngoc System (ie “bald”, former Deputy Director General of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense), Mr. Thang said in February 2012 that he did not know Mr. System, at the end of 2013 both only know each other.
The defendant Nguyen Hong Truong, former Vice Minister of Transport. Photo: HOANG GIANG
He himself only signed a document to present to the Prime Minister. In October 2013, he signed a letter to establish the auction council, the pen for the approval of the vice minister (Mr. Nguyen Van The is now Minister of Transport). Also, he was not aware of the content of the contract, so it is not true that VKS said that he was the person with the lead role throughout the case.
The amount of 725 billion is determined to be a loss, Mr. Thang said that this is the money to evade income and tax evasion, then will be adjusted in accordance with tax regulations. And in court, the representative of the Ministry of Transport (damaged) did not claim any damages.
At the end of the defense, Mr. Thang “expects the Panel to treat me like other normal people.”
Lawyer: Why are you accusing Mr. Dinh La Thang?
(OLP) – Counsel suggested that the Panel apply the principle of innocent speculation to Mr. Dinh La Thang because VKS’s allegation is inconsistent with the evidence gathered.
[ad_2]
