[ad_1]
|
Mr. Dinh La Thang and Ut “bald” appeared again in court for irregularities in the highway project. |
Consequently, in the content of the questioning of Mr. Dinh La Thang, responding to the VKS, Mr. Thang stated once again that he was as familiar with the Dinh Ngoc System as other people.
Mr. Dinh La Thang replied: “According to you 22, the number is more, how much is more, how is it less. Someone to whom I make hundreds of calls, nothing important to break the law at all… ”.
VKS interrupted: “Thanks defendant.” Mr. Dinh La Thang continued to present: “Let me say first. Does anyone tell me to restrict each call, per person? I ask the VKS to ask a question that is not imposing. “
VKS representative interrogates defendant Dinh La Thang |
Furthermore, VKS asked Duong Tuan Minh (former CEO of Cuu Long Corporation) that: “Did the defendant say that the defendant Dinh La Thang called to introduce Mr. System, right or wrong?”
Defendant Minh replied: “Mr. Thang did call the defendant. After that call, the defendant received a call from a person claiming to be from Thai Son Company and made an appointment to work. The defendant then continued to receive the phone call from Mr. Thang asking the defendant to arrange a job with Thai Son Company. “
Furthermore, during the VKS questioning, the defendant Duong Thi Tram Anh (former Deputy CEO of Cuu Long Corporation) claimed that he had received a phone call from a person saying that Yen Khanh Company wanted to participate in the purchase. collection rights. Talk about the relationship between Defendant Thang and the Defendant System. Then in 2013, on Mr. Thang’s birthday, “I met Mr. He, but at that time I didn’t know Mr. He. Later I found out, ”presented the defendant Tram Anh.
Defendant Minh confirmed that Mr. Dinh La Thang called to discuss Ut’s “bald” Thai Son company |
[ad_2]
