[ad_1]
At the conclusion of the investigation of the HCM City – Trung Luong highway case, the police investigation agency of the Ministry of Public Security requested the Supreme VKSND to prosecute Mr. Dinh La Thang, former Minister of Transport (Transportation), and Nguyen Hong Truong, former Vice Minister of Transport, on the crime of Violation of the regulations on the management and use of State assets, causing losses and waste.
In particular, the investigative agency of the Ministry of Public Security accused Mr. Dinh La Thang of planning and leading the crime, causing a loss of 725 billion VND in the case. It should be noted that the Investigation Agency also identified it Nguyen Van El (then Vice Minister of Transport, now Minister of Transport) signed 3 documents that do not conform to the law.
Specifically, the investigating agency concludes the process of managing the payment of the winning bid, as soon as the Yen Khanh Company (the defendant’s company Dinh Ngoc System, that is, “bald”) made the payment not on time. Cuu Long Corporation has 12 documents to report to the Ministry of Transportation. So, the Ministry of Transport has 12 documents to address but does not propose to terminate before the contract deadline as prescribed, revoke the right to charge fees.
Among the aforementioned Ministry guidance documents, the investigating agency identified Mr. Nguyen Van El at that time, in the role of Deputy Minister of Transportation, he signed 3 documents. Accordingly, on August 31, 2015, Mr. The signed a document to Cuu Long Corporation, Yen Khanh Company to instruct Yen Khanh to urgently pay as promised, to pay 100 billion VND by 28. -8 -2015 and pay the rest before September 30, 2015.
Then, on October 8, 2015, Mr. Nguyen Van The continued to sign a document ordering Cuu Long Corporation to urge Yen Khanh to pay full payment for the right to collect highway fees. The third document is the report signed by Mr. The on June 22, 2015 to send to Mr. Dinh La Thang, informing that Yen Khanh Company has not yet paid the remaining amount under the contract of more than 900 billion VND .
On June 23, 2015, Mr. Dinh La Thang Thang pointed to the above address, in the left corner of the report: “Please suggest that Mr. The direct the agreement in accordance with the contract signed by the two parties and in accordance with the provisions of the law. Law. However, it is necessary to clarify the responsibilities of investors and state agencies, Cuu Long Corporation ”.
After that, Mr. Nguyen Van The gave his following address under the criticism of Mr. Dinh La Thang: “Urgently ask Cuu Long Corporation, Department of Finance, Legal … to work with Yen Company again. Khanh discussed each specific issue, reaching clear and definitive conclusions … “.
Next, in order to have a reason to report the delay and offset the amount to be paid, on July 22, 2014, Yen Khanh Company signed a document to the Ministry of Transportation, Cuu Long Corporation to propose Yen Khanh Company was designated as an investor to build two additional intersections on the route connecting Tan Tao – Cho Dem in the form of BOT or BOT combined with BT with a total investment of VND 1.3 billion.
Mr. Dinh La Thang wrote his criticism on the report: “Okay, please send Mr. The to solve.” Mr. The continued to write and critique the proposals related to this BOT project.
The Ministry of Public Security concluded that Mr. Nguyen Van The signed the governing documents in 2015 and presided over the conclusion that many meetings with the above content do not comply with the law, legalizing public content. Yen Khanh Company Proposal.
The investigating agency noted that the wrongdoing by Mr. Dinh La Thang and the defendants made Dinh Ngoc System’s Yen Khanh company, an unprofitable company, ineligible to participate but won the auction.
“The misdeeds of each individual at each stage are closely related to each other, inseparable, causing losses and damages to the State for more than 725 billion dong” – stated the conclusion of the investigation.
It should be noted that the police investigation agency of the Ministry of Public Security concluded signing the guiding documents in 2015 and presided over the conclusion that many meetings with the above content do not comply with the law, legally. content proposed by Yen Khanh Company. However, no form of treatment or recommendations were indicated for Mr. Nguyen Van The.
[ad_2]
