[ad_1]
On the night of October 30, Huong Giang posted her latest moves after being massively attacked by an anti-fan group with more than 100,000 followers. Specifically, Huong Giang said that I got what I am today thanks to the support of the audience and the fans.
Huong Giang said, always appreciate your audience who always give sincere suggestions and help Giang better day by day. Therefore, Huong Giang will listen to the opinion of the audience, will not appear dense on television, and will express his personal opinion.
“Giang will pay more attention to his speech and facial expressions, do better things for the community and society, to make his audience happy. And the antifan is NO. Many artists have done it.” he silently endured and released him, but Huong Giang DID NOT “, Huong Giang confirmed in the post.
In addition, Huong Giang also posted photos of working with the authorities in a room. Immediately after it was published, the public opinion disputed about this photo and made many different opinions.
The online community said Huong Giang can have a complete base to work with the authorities. Some other opinions commented that the photo was not real because if the incident was investigated it would be at the police station. Someone objectively expressed their point of view because Huong Giang only posted a photo and did not say anything more about the content of the photo, so this photo is only considered as an illustration for publication.
In order to have more objective perspectives from the legal perspective, we had an interview with attorney Tran Xuan Tien, director of Dong Doi law firm, Hanoi Bar Association. According to attorney Tran Xuan Tien, because the photo does not clearly explain the content, this case has no basis for determining exactly what functional forces are working with.
Attorney Tran Xuan Tien
However, according to lawyer Tran Xuan Tien, according to criminal proceedings, Investigative authorities have the right to collect documents and evidence from the organizing body. Therefore, the investigative agency has the right to work with the accused.
“In case of filing a lawsuit claiming damages, Huong Giang can file a lawsuit at Huong Giang’s residence. In case of criminal complaint, Huong Giang must submit a complaint to the investigating police agency, the district police where the offenders commit. illicit acts.
At the same time, provide documents that prove the violations of the violators. In case of not knowing where the offenders are, Huong Giang can also submit a request to the Cybersecurity Department, “ Lawyer Money Actions.
Sharing on this issue, lawyer Nguyen Trung Tin (Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association) said that according to the working process, the commune, district and city police should invite the parties to the office to work. According to lawyer Tin, the determination of the police bodies at all levels that have the authority to process complaints, criminal complaints and request for prosecution is specified in articles 9 and 268 of the 2015 Criminal Procedure Code. Jurisdiction The law of the police body To receive and resolve complaints, criminal complaints and requests for prosecution corresponds to the decision-making jurisdiction of the Court.
Consequently, only the police agency investigating the police at the district, city level; Investigation Security Agency, Investigation Police Agency of the Police Department of the province or city directly dependent on the Central Government; The Investigations Security Agency, the Investigative Police of the Ministry of Public Security, will have the function of processing complaints, criminal information and the request for persecution.
Note: Police agencies are tasked with conducting a series of investigative activities (defined in Clause 6, Article 9 of the Organization of Criminal Investigation Agencies Act of 2015); Police of communes, neighborhoods and townships; Police stations and police stations do not have the authority to receive and resolve requests for prosecution.
1. In articles 191, 195 and 196 of the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, the procedures for the reception and processing of petition requests are established below: Complaints filed by the litigants directly in court or via postal services. Within 03 business days after receiving the petition, the President of the Court will assign a Judge to consider the petition.
Within 05 business days following the date of their assignment, the judge must consider the petition for the claim and make one of the following decisions: Request for amendment and completion of the petition; Carry out the procedures for the acceptance of the case according to the normal or simplified procedures; Transfer the petition to a competent court and notify the petitioner if the case is under the jurisdiction of another court; Return the petition to the petitioner if the case does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Court.
If the case falls under his jurisdiction, the judge must immediately notify the plaintiff so that he can go to the Court to carry out the procedures for the payment of the judicial cost advance (if it is in the case of the judicial cost advance). The plaintiff must pay the advance court costs within 7 days from the date of receipt of the court’s notice of payment of the advance court costs. Upon receipt of the advance cost advance from the court, the accepting judge will accept the case and send a notification to the plaintiff, the defendant or the person with related interests and obligations within 03 business days.
2. In accordance with article 147 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 2015, there are provisions on the time and procedures to resolve complaints, criminal complaints and request for prosecution as follows: Within 20 days after the date of Al receiving complaints, allegations of crimes, requests for prosecution, investigating agencies and agencies assigned to investigate shall examine, verify and issue one of the following decisions: intends to prosecute criminal cases; Decision not to prosecute a criminal case; Decide to suspend the processing of complaints, criminal complaints and propose prosecution.
If the case is reported, the information about a crime or a request for prosecution contains many complicated details or must be inspected and verified in many places, the deadline to resolve the report, information or request for prosecution can not last more than 02 months.
If the inspection and verification cannot be completed within the period specified in this Clause, the head of the Prosecutor’s Office of the same level or the head of the competent Prosecutor’s Office may extend it once for no more than 2 months.
[ad_2]
