[ad_1]
In the debate and response in court, most of the former defendants and leaders of the Da Nang People’s Committee expressed their performance of the tasks assigned by their superiors and had no personal motivation.
Former Da Nang President Tran Van Minh stated many reasons why he did not violate the law, as the first instance verdict was condemned. When he became president, his predecessors organized many houses and public lands.
Specifically, No. 158 Bach Dang, Mr. Minh said that he was criticized by his predecessor and directed the sale. Property No. 20 Bach Dang, Mr. Minh argued that it was a parcel of land, not a public house as alleged. At the same time, this property of the predecessor signed the leasing decision.
In conclusion, Mr. Minh asked the Court and the Prosecutor’s Office to present material evidence to accuse him; If not, ask the Appeals Panel to appeal the defendant as not guilty, return the file to re-investigate the case.
The defendant Van Huu Chien, former president of Da Nang also complained, that the policy of selling houses and public land in Da Nang has existed in earlier terms. When he became a leader, Mr. Chien only signed and replaced in accordance with regulations.
Regarding the charges of being an accomplice with Mr. Tran Van Minh, Mr. Chien did not present documents and evidence to prove this. The defendant said that signing some documents while he was vice president of Da Nang was to follow the orders of the superiors.
Defendant Phan Van Anh Vu disagreed with the first instance verdict accusing him of “playing an important role; the defendant’s behavior is the cause of the disorganization of the Danang government …”. Since then, the defendant Vu said the first instance sentence is without foundation. In addition, Mr. Vu requested the appeal to specify material evidence of the case.
In response to a series of accusations by the representative of the Prosecutor’s Office, defendant Vu said the case was “problematic”. Vu “aluminum” presented so much about the case that the President repeatedly interrupted because he thought these things were said over and over from the first instance to the appeal.
Lawyer Nguyen Huu The Trach, who defended defendant Phan Van Anh Vu, after pointing out the evidence and the provisions of the law, asked the appeal to amend the first instance sentence, stating that his client did not commit a crime. crime in this case.
Several attorneys defending other defendants also asked the appeals court to return the files and re-investigate them.
In response to the opinions of the accused, the opinions of the lawyers, the representative of the Office of the Prosecutor expressed some content to prove the criminal acts of the accused; Identify infringing properties and property recovery and distraction issues.
One of the issues of concern on appeal is why the damage was determined at the time of prosecution and not at other times. VKS believes that because such assets are highly profitable, the damage applied at the time of processing an investigation is appropriate.
President Ngo Anh Dung also repeatedly interrupted the lawyers, asking that he no longer respond to the pricing problems because from the first instance to the appeal he indicated.
Difficult to retrieve wrong projects
Regarding civil issues in the case, in particular the 29ha Da Phuoc International Urban Area project was revoked for the first time.
Under the first instance judgment, former Da Nang President Tran Van Minh and his subordinates created the conditions for Phan Van Anh Vu Construction Joint Stock Company 79 to participate in the project and receive the right to use the land area of 29ha. in the international urban area of Da Phuoc without auction of land use rights. The acts of the accused have caused the state budget to exceed 11.2 trillion dong.
The first instance verdict found that Vu “aluminum” transferred his entire stake in Da Phuoc Housing Development One Member Company Limited to Mr. Vo Ngoc Chau for more than 420 billion dong. Currently, the 29 hectare project of the Da Phuoc International Urban Area is invested by Da Phuoc Housing Development Co., Ltd., developed by Mr. Vo Ngoc Chau as CEO and has transferred 189 lots to 189 clients.
For this project, the Court of First Instance stated: “Assign the Da Nang People’s Committee to revoke and work with related parties to carry out legal proceedings as prescribed by law to guarantee the rights of citizens … “
Presented in the appeals court, Mr. Vo Ngoc Chau stated that he was completely sincere because when he bought the project, he did not completely know if the project was auctioned or not.
“I don’t know what the results will be like today.” – Mr. Chau said.
Since the trial court decision was not fair, Mr. Chau cited two other projects, An Cu Extended Project and Phu Gia Compound, and said that these two projects are similar in nature to the 29 ha Da Phuoc Project but the trial court only recovered 29 hectares of the project.
In addition, Chau said, the withdrawal of the project caused his company to declare bankruptcy; 10 national partners, 2 foreign companies and 2 banks sued; people (more than 200 households) lost their trust, organized massive complaints, causing insecurity …
Regarding this project, the representative of the Da Nang People’s Committee, who was present in court, said that the revocation of the project that violates the auction will face many difficulties. According to this representative, a number of projects have people living in, if they recover, what the compensation will be like to guarantee social security.
Since then, the representative of the Da Nang City People’s Committee has asked the appeals court to guide the city in organizing implementation, upholding the law and not lasting.
Tien Nguyen
[ad_2]
