[ad_1]
This afternoon, 12-5, the People’s Court of Hoa Binh Province continued to question defendants related to the 2018 National High School Exam fraud in Hoa Binh province.
Defendant Nguyen Thi Thu Loan (SN 1979), a former Lac Long Quan High School teacher, head of group 1, Literature, confessed to having improved his scores and cried many times when asked. Loan admitted to having incorrect test scores for 10 increased cases from the management of Diep Thi Hong Lien, former Deputy Head of the Testing Department.
Defendant Bui Thanh Tra
Defendant Nguyen Thi Hong Chung (SN 1980, former Ngo Quyen High School teacher, Head of Section 2) stated that he only helped Lien by looking at the documents and passing the information on to the judges. “Ms. Lien said that the help information, because of the leadership, but the defendant does not affect the examination, does not affect the increase in points” – said Chung.
Defendant Bui Thanh Tra (SN 1980, former Luong Son High School teacher, Group 3 Leader) claimed to have participated thanks to the qualification of 3 students due to Lien’s direction. After that, Tra gave 3 candidates with the nominal number and gave the desired score to the 3 judges to help increase the score.
It is worth mentioning that, in this afternoon question session, many teachers who participated in the exams were summoned to the court, simultaneously denouncing in front of the Panel, being directed and forced to score scores for dozens of exams.
Defendant Nguyen Thi Thu Loan
Specifically, teacher Bui Thi Thu Hien said that Tra had asked her to give the contestant a score, but disagreed, after Tra continued to ask for a blank signature on a paper, at this time, Ms. Hien. He hesitated, General Tra “Sign it, you don’t understand”. After that, defendant Lien appeared to be asking for a classification and said “leader case,” so Ms. Hien signed and claimed which leader she did not know.
And teacher Le Thi Hanh said that if Tea impacted her, she would be asked to get a score of 8, otherwise it should be 7.5 points. I think with this article, I didn’t get a score like that and I didn’t want to give it a mark, but Tra said, “This is a boss post.”
Similarly, teacher Pham Dinh Luong said he had finished an exam and signed it with a score of 2.5 in the afternoon. Salary disagreed, but Chung was concerned, creating pressure to say that he couldn’t score 7 points and then 4 points. Due to Luong’s pressure, he said he had scored those 4 points in the test.
Defendant Nguyen Thi Hong Chung
According to the Supreme VKSND indictment, after Do Manh Tuan (former deputy director of the ethnic minority boarding school for the Lac Thuy District and High School) “gave birth” to the contradicting essay and passed it on to Nguyen Quang Vinh . (former Head of the Testing Department), Vinh continued to transfer to Diep Thi Hong Lien.
After that, Lien took the initiative to compare information from “compass code”, “exam bag code” and passed the information from the candidate to Nguyen Thi Thu Loan (leader of group 1), Nguyen Thi Hong Chung (leader of the group 2) and Bui Thanh Tra (leader of group 3), leading the intervention to raise the test scores for the candidates.
The three team leaders, Chung, Tra, and Loan, read the “bar code,” “required score,” to ask teachers to grade, or to directly record grades on the candidate’s exam and then let the teacher sign it. correctly, no return point.
As a result, 22 literature tests were evaluated from 1.25 to 4.5 points, of which 20 were determined as intentional intervention.
[ad_2]
