[ad_1]
The defendants at trial – Photo: GIANG LONG
On the afternoon of October 26, the trial court that saw the grand trial of the Commercial Equity Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (BIDV) continued with the 1.7 billion damages. The court spends half the morning and afternoon with the prosecutor releasing the 100-page indictment.
According to the accusation published in court, in addition to his errors Tran Bac Ha, Tran Luc Lang (53 years old, former BIDV deputy general director in charge of risk management), Doan Anh Sang (59 years old, former BIDV deputy general director in charge of corporate clients) and accomplices causing 1.7 billion damages It should be noted that also there is the behavior of Tran Duy Tung there are signs of “illegal cross-border transport of goods and currency”, “money laundering”.
10.4 million dollar roundabout highway
According to the indictment, Tran Duy Tung (son of Mr. Tran Bac Ha) asked Tran Anh Quang and Thai Thanh Vinh to sign up to contribute capital to An Phu Group, Tran Anh Quang served as Chairman of the Board of Directors for help Tung.
Phu Group was awarded an overseas investment certificate to establish a joint venture of SHH Vientiane Company with an overseas investment capital of nearly 300 billion VND.
From 2013 to 2015, Tung and Vinh paid USD 10.4 million in cash to Vinh’s account opened in Laos – Vietnam Joint Venture Bank (LaoVietBank).
Later, Tung used $ 10 million from Vinh’s account to transfer it to Outhid Houng Heang Company. In addition, to elude authorities, on December 23, 2015, An Phu Group transferred $ 4 million to Laos.
Outhid Houng Heung Company on behalf of SHH Vientiane Company to transfer $ 10 million equity contribution to LaoVietBank account to contribute 10% of equity capital.
SHH Vientiane Company is one of three shareholders contributing capital to LaoVietBank and owns 10% of the shares. However, this company does not pay directly, but through Outhid Houng Heung Company.
Representative of the Prosecutor’s Office maintains the prosecution in court – Photo: GIANG LONG
According to the indictment, An Phu Group’s application for a foreign investment certificate to establish a joint venture is SHH Vientiane Company, the capital contribution to LaoVietBank is to legalize and hide the behavior of investing abroad. outside of the illegal activities of Tran Duy Tung, Thai Thanh Vinh and Tran Anh Quang.
Furthermore, all dividends of more than USD 2.3 million (more than VND 53 billion) that LaoVietBank paid to SHH Vientiane Company, which Tran Duy Tung personally managed and used, did not return to the country as stated in the article. . 65 Investment Law of 2014.
The act of illegal payment of USD 10.4 million by Tran Duy Tung and Thai Thanh Vinh has signs of “illegal transportation of currency across the border” or “money laundering”.
However, because Tran Duy Tung and Thai Thanh Vinh are on the run, it is not possible to testify to clarify the source of $ 10.4 million.
The Investigations Police Agency of the Ministry of Public Security has separated the case of acts with signs of illegal transport of currency across the border, money laundering to investigate, when two defendants are surprised by the police. Consult for further clarification.
Tran Duy Tung is the second owner of the “backyard” company.
According to the indictment, Tran Duy Tung was more related to his father’s “backyard” company, Mr. Tran Bac Ha. An Phu Group is run by Tung is the CEO and Hoang Anh Gia Lai Group was introduced by the Mr. Ha to run a cow farming project in Ha Tinh.
As a general rule, BIDV cannot extend credit to An Phu Company. Mr. Tran Bac Ha has established Binh Ha Livestock Joint Stock Company, the registered capital is 200 billion dong as “backyard”. The two shareholders of this company, Tran Anh Quang and Thai Thanh Vinh, only highlight their names to contribute capital on behalf of Tung.
The other shareholder is Dinh Van Dung, presented by Hoang Anh Gia Lai Group.
Tran Duy Tung is actually the second boss, who directly directs all the activities of this “backyard” company.
The defendant Tran Luc Lang was escorted to court – Photo: LIST
From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Tran Bac Ha instructed his subordinates at BIDV to disburse more than 2.6 billion VND to Binh Ha Company with preferential treatment on equity capital and guarantees.
After the BIDV Bank disbursement, Tran Duy Tung instructed shareholders to collect the money from the sale of cows without sending it to Binh Ha Company’s account.
The prosecution found that Tung and his accomplices had appropriated, causing damage to the BIDV of almost 150 billion VND. However, An Phu Group, led by Tung as Chairman of the Board of Directors, has stood out for receiving more than 128 billion of debt to legalize and conceal the appropriation, so the damage is now just over 26 billion .
The Prosecutor’s Office attributed Mr. Tran Bac Ha to be the main and absolute responsible in the direction of the illegal loans, causing damages to the BIDV for almost 1.7 billion VND. However, Mr. Ha died during detention due to a medical condition, for which the investigating agency suspended the accused.
The president of the BIDV was summoned but authorized the representative
Previously, in the proceedings, the Panel announced that it had summoned Mr. Phan Duc Tu, President of the Board of Directors of BIDV, as a person with related rights and obligations, but was absent, authorizing Ms. Nguyen Thi Phuong to represent to the participant. attend court.
It was attended by Mr. Vo Huu Hao, Deputy Director of the Planning and Investment Department, on behalf of the Ha Tinh People’s Committee, in addition there were representatives from Binh Ha Company, Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Company …
The Prosecutor’s Office said that despite the lack of several witnesses, many people with related rights and obligations, these people had testimonies during the investigation, for which they asked the Panel to continue with the trial. During the trial, if necessary, the Prosecutor’s Office will request the court to summon these people.
Judge BIDV Bank’s big case with a loss of 1.7 billion dong
