[ad_1]
The CSDT agency of the Ministry of Public Security has completed the conclusion of the investigation of the rape case on the Ho Chi Minh City-Trung Luong Highway. Transfer the file to the Supreme VKSND requesting the prosecution of 20 defendants, including boxes.ng Dinh La Thang (born 1960, former Minister of Transport, currently serving sentence in another case), Nguyen Hong Truong (born 1957, former Deputy Minister of Transport) …
CQĐT The Ministry of Public Security also determined that Transport Minister Nguyen Van The had a series of “criticisms” who did not agree with the law related to the case.
Mr. Nguyen Van The. Documentary photo: PLO
Accordingly, in the process of managing the payment of the winning auction money, as soon as Yen Khanh Company makes a payment not on time, Cuu Long Corporation has informed the Ministry of Transportation in writing, and this Ministry has only written. religion.
Mr. Nguyen Van The (then Deputy Minister of Transportation) signed three documents indicating not to terminate the contract before the prescribed deadline, charging the right to charge fees.
Specifically, the document signed on August 31, 2015, Vice Minister Nguyen Van The sent Cuu Long Corporation, Yen Khanh Company to direct: Request Yen Khanh Company to rely on the Ministry of Transportation’s Notice of Completion to urgently implement Pay In accordance with the committed schedule, assign Cuu Long Corporation as responsible for the payment as committed. On October 8, 2015, Mr. Can signed the document with similar content …
In addition to the above documents, when Cuu Long Corporation reported a proposal to terminate the contract, Nguyen Chi Thanh (former Deputy Director of the Finance Department of the Ministry of Transport) advised that the wording be submitted to Vice Minister Nguyen Van The to sign the submitted on 22 June 2015 Minister Dinh La Thang on the implementation of the contract to purchase the right to collect highway charges in Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong.
The following day, Mr. Dinh La Thang pointed to the above address, in the left corner of the report: “Ask Mr. The to direct the agreement in accordance with the contract signed by both parties and in accordance with the provisions of the law . However, it is also necessary to clarify the responsibilities of investors and state agencies, Cuu Long Corporation ”.
After that, Mr. The followed the following direction under the criticism of Mr. Dinh La Thang: “Quick, ask Cuu Long Corporation, Department of Finance, Legal … to work with Yen Khanh Thao Company again. Comment on each specific topic, with clear and definitive conclusions … ”.
To have a reason to report the delay and compensate the amount to be paid, on July 22, 2014, Yen Khanh Company signed a document with the Ministry of Transportation, Cuu Long Corporation. The report proposes the assignment of Yen Khanh Company to be designated as an investor to build two additional intersections on the Tan Tao-Cho Dem route of the Ho Chi Minh City-Trung Luong Expressway, in the form of a BOT or BOT contract combined with BT. .
The total investment of the project is 1.3 billion VND, the recovery plan is the proposal to increase the ticket price through the Ho Chi Minh City-Trung Luong highway. Part of the cost invested by Yen Khanh Company in 2 intersections will be deducted from the remaining payable amount of the contract.
Mr. Dinh La Thang wrote his criticism of the report: “Okay, no, he can solve it. Mr. The wrote again: “The PPP Board n / a, proposing the issues related to this BOT project.”
Specific documents: Lead Cuu Long Corporation and chair many meetings to direct the formulation of project approval procedures; Sign a proposal to the Ministry of Finance proposing the implementation of the financial plan; Sign the document and send the Prime Minister a proposal to appoint Yen Khanh Company as an investor. Sign the decision to approve the project proposal on the BOT form.
After that, Yen Khanh Company still did not pay as promised, but has not yet terminated the contract. As of March 30, 2017, Yen Khanh Company had just paid the winning amount of 2,004 billion VND …
|
The two companies were in court Because the Yen Khanh company violated the contract for the sale of the right to collect fees (late payment), Cuu Long Corporation sued in the Binh Thanh District People’s Court (Ho Chi Minh City) to request the Yen Khanh company to pay penalties for late payment. maths. The two-tier court compelled the Yen Khanh Company to pay the Cuu Long Corporation an amount of 262 billion VND. At the same time, the court accepted a part of the Yen Khanh Company’s request to force Cuu Long Corporation to repay the amount to compensate for the damage caused by the construction and installation of the VND 2.4 billion ITS copper system. On July 9, 2018, Yen Khanh Company submitted a request for review of cassation to the two previous judgments. The senior VKSND in Ho Chi Minh City has issued a request to postpone the trial. On August 4-5 and August 19, the CSDT agency of the Ministry of Public Security sent a document to the high-level People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City to cancel the first instance sentence and appeal of this dispute, to ensure a complete solution. , unified in criminal cases accepted by the CSDT agency of the Ministry of Public Security. |
[ad_2]
