[ad_1]
Two former leaders of the Ministry of Transport in court – Photo: QUANG DINH
On the afternoon of December 14, the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway violation trial resulted in a loss of 725 billion VND related to Mr. Dinh La Thang, Nguyen Hong Truong (former head of the Ministry of Transportation ) and 18 defendants. the interrogation began.
If, Mr. Dinh La Thang (former Minister of Transport), Mr. Nguyen Hong Truong (former Deputy Minister of Transport) and 5 accused former employees of the Ministry of Transport were charged with “violating the rules of management and use. State property causes wasteful losses. ”
Dinh Ngoc System (ie Ut ‘bald’) and 12 other defendants were indicted for “fraudulent appropriation of property”. Furthermore, Dinh Ngoc System was also prosecuted for abusing his position and power to influence others for selfish purposes.
Specifically, Mr. Thang, as Minister of Transport, introduced Dinh Ngoc System company to tackle the project. Auction the right to collect tolls for the HCMC – Trung Luong highways. Taking advantage of this relationship, We and our accomplices falsify the financial records and reports of these companies to be eligible to participate in the auction.
After winning the auction, the system instructed the staff to hide the income, intervene in the management software of the Ministry of Transportation to appropriate the collection of the toll.
Responding to the first questioning, the defendant Vu Thi Hoan (director of Yen Khanh Company, the company that won the auction for the right to charge for roads in Ho Chi Minh City, Trung Luong) admitted that the accusation is correct.
Hoan stated that the relationship between Dinh Ngoc System and I was my grandson. In 2005, System directly asked Hoan to establish the Yen Khanh Company under his name. Holding the position of director and legal representative, but in fact Hoan does not participate in the capital contribution, does not participate in the meeting of the company’s Board of Directors.
Hoan confessed that he was only a director in the archive, representing Mr. Dinh Ngoc System, and the operating operations of the Yen Khanh Company were assigned by Mr. Dinh Ngoc System to Pham Van Diet. In addition, Diet is also the CEO of many other Mr. System companies.
Although the director, but Hoan’s job is an accountant, overseeing bank loans. Every month, Diet paid Hoan 15 million VND, and 2 months before his arrest, Kiet increased Hoan’s salary to 25 million.
According to the records, the defendant Vu Thi Hoan was indicted for fraudulent appropriation of property as an accessory to help the Dinh Ngoc System usurp the tolls on the HCMC – Trung Luong highway.
Specifically, the defendant had the act of signing the auction participation form, falsifying the financial statements of Yen Khanh Company from loss to profit in order for the company to participate in the auction to buy the right to charge fees.
The defendant also authorized Pham Van Diet to participate in the auction on behalf of the auction, to sign the agreement to purchase the right to collect the fees, sign the contract of sale for the right to collect the fees, and sign a credit agreement with Thanh Do BIDV branch to borrow. 1,703 billion VND to pay for the purchase of the right to charge fees, sign 7 official letters sent to Cuu Long Corporation (dependent on the Ministry of Transportation), participate in the destruction of accounting records and documents and legalize the source of toll collection sign Free 17 votes …
According to the indictment, Vu Thi Hoan admitted that his behavior had created the conditions for the Dinh Ngoc System to take over the collection of state fees.
In court, the defendant testified with the signed records of Pham Van Diet or To Phuoc Hung (chief accountant for Yen Khanh Company), that the defendant would sign for the company.
“With the file of the financial statements of the Yen Khanh company with the signature of Hung, the defendant heard Hung say to help him sign this file, the defendant signed” – said Hoan.
In addition, the defendant also said that he did not participate in any stage of the auction to buy the right to collect tolls for the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway, not knowing that Yen Khanh Company had interfered with the system. collection of fees to appropriate toll charges.
Furthermore, Hoan claimed in 7 documents sent to Cuu Long Corporation, there are 4 documents signed by the defendant, and 3 of the other three signatures on the remaining 3 documents are not from the defendant.
The trial continued to question on the morning of December 15.
