[ad_1]
This afternoon, December 29, the trial of first instance tried the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam (45 years old, former vice president of the 4th District People’s Court, Ho Chi Minh City) and Lam Hoang Tung (29 years old, former professor of the School of Education and Training). Prosecutor in Ho Chi Minh City) is guilty of “trespassing on the residence of others.”
|
Former Deputy Chief Judge Nguyen Hai Nam broke the table: “People have integrity” |
What did the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam say?
In response to a question from the representative of the Institute of Civil Engineering in Ho Chi Minh City, Nguyen Hai Nam claimed that he had known Lam Hoang Tung since 2016, when he was in graduate school.
At the same time, when Nguyen Hai Nam was working as a judge in the 1st District People’s Court, Lam Hoang Tung called Nam to discuss the house dispute, which Ms. Thao (Hoang Thi Thu Thao, the victim – PV) placed Deposit to buy a 7 billion house, 3 months past due deposit but no contract, and asked Nam about the lawsuit.
Consequently, Nguyen Hai Nam ordered Tung to file a lawsuit in District 1 Court.
The entire incident was recorded on camera and shown in court. |
The defendant Nguyen Hai Nam continued to testify, about 10 days before the incident, Tung and Nam met in the cafeteria, at that time, Tung said, “Thao’s son will pay for the house on the weekend.” When Tung was asked the reason, Tung said that because the Construction Department sent an official letter to clear and overcome the illegal construction, Thao agreed to hand over the house.
“As a brother, I am working as a lawyer again, so I told Tung to turn over the house so that it was correct. One is inviting redundancy to establish vi by home delivery, the other is inviting a notary to make a contract on the delivery of the house; make a report to the authorities about the admission. I was so careful that I told Tung why they let him in, ”said Nguyen Hai Nam.
Also according to Tung’s testimony, two days after the incident occurred, there was contact between Nam and Tung. Tung informed Nam about Ms. Thao’s appointment for the home delivery date and asked Nam to find the redundant office to establish a home delivery certificate.
Lam Hoang Tung “prayed for help” Nguyen Hai Nam
Furthermore, through Nam’s testimony, he also shows that, on the day of the incident, September 19, 2019, when Tung called him to tell him that someone was renting a house at 29 Nguyen Binh it was disturbing and he refused to hand over the house. and “Pray for help” Nam, defendant Nam called Mr. Tran Hai Dang (Head of Da Kao Police Department, District 1) to the scene.
“When I called, Đăng said he didn’t know the matter and asked me again who it was on. I said that Ms. Thao appointed a family member to deliver the house, but that three tenants were working there. Help me late, “Nam declared.
Accordingly, Nam said: “According to the camera, at 3:31 p.m., the police arrived. At 4:20 p.m., I arrived and saw that there were 2 or 3 fellow neighborhood policemen sitting, on both sides there were people in the room. The fact that the incident is redundant has created a title, so I went out for coffee. When I sat down for coffee, Tung Dien said to order a taxi. Returning to Ms. Thao, unafraid of the night when they told Tung to kidnap. When a taxi came in, I saw people pushing themselves to carry the baby, at that moment, Tung asked me to bring a child, I held him because no one would accept him.
|
According to the indictment, stemming from a dispute over the sale and purchase of a house 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem (P. Da Kao, District 1) between Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi and Ms. Hoang Thi Thu Thao, around 14 00:00 hours on September 19, 2019, When Ms. Thao was not at home, Lam Hoang Tung, Nguyen Hai Nam, Nguyen Thi Huong Tam (fleeing) broke into this house, using force and mentally pressuring the family to leave the house and occupy the house. Keep the house until September 28, 2019. After taking over the house, Tung assigned the security company to take care of the house, not allowing members of Thao’s family to enter the house. During this time, Tung sent someone to dismantle various other items in the house. At the investigative agency, Nguyen Hai Nam and Lam Hoang Tung do not admit to criminal acts. However, the evidence is that the camera data collected at 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem Alley completely records the actions of the defendants, enough to conclude the actions of Lam Hoang Tung, Nguyen Hai Nam, Nguyen Thi Huong Tam that they have committed. . in the crime of “invading the residence of other people.” |
[ad_2]
