[ad_1]
The defendant Nguyen Hai Nam after the morning trial – Photo: QUANG DINH
Defendant Nguyen Hai Nam: Human must have integrity!
When participating in the interrogation part, the accused Nguyen Hai Nam said that he was very inhibited because during the investigation Mr. Nam said that he wanted to end the case, but the prosecutor advised him to confess quickly.
The panel asked the defendant Nam if he had removed people from the 29th house of Nguyen Binh Khiem from this house. Mr. Nam replied that he could not enter the house.
Defendant Nam wishes to be brought to court – Video: QUANG DINH
“When I arrived I saw the civil defense, the police were full in the street. The baby was in the street, people were pushing, I saw danger, so I protected the baby. I am very bitter, my conscience does not allow it.” In doing that, I must have integrity. 1 year and 3 months I have an injustice, “Mr. Nam is upset.
Defendant Nam said that during the investigation he requested to be videotaped when taking testimony, but the prosecution did not allow it.
Defendant Lam Hoang Tung: Suggest to VKS to respect the right of presentation of the defendant.
Responding to the VKS ‘question about the purpose of the 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem project, the defendant Lam Hoang Tung said that he came to the project to manage and correct the construction errors in accordance with the inspection decision. These are content authorized by Ms. Chi.
However, when Tung did not finish his presentation, the VKS representative interrupted, so Tung said, “I asked the VKS representative to respect the defendant’s right to introduce himself, not to interrupt. I listened very well to VKS’s question, but it was new. He answered a few words were interrupted. “
Mr. Tung said that when he left with Thanh Ho Security Company and returned to the house in District 1, there were tenants and 2 children.
VKS asked who the person was who got into a fight with the defendant Tung in the clip. Tung replied that on September 19, there were many people coming in front of the 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem house, they did not leave the house, so they did not know where they came from.
Ms. Lua and Ms. Suong announced that they would be leaving the house at 5:00 am and leaving the children behind. I take the children out of the house because, according to my subjectivity, this is an infringing work that has to be dismantled, so the children are not safe at home. Outside, there are a lot of people pushing and yelling “give me back the kids”, but they just pushed to film the clip, not holding the kids.
Construction sites for others to take care of are normal
VKS asked him why he thought this house could not be inhabited, but he also signed a lease for Mr. Nam. Tung said that it was very normal to let someone else in to take care of the project.
“I briefed Mr. Nam on the status of the grim work of about 2002 others may not need to be dismantled. Nam and I are friends from graduate school, I call defendant Nam. I told Mr. Nam that I was a co-owner of a construction project in 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem, but I did not raise the dispute, “said defendant Tung.
Speaking about the reason why Mr. Nam was present at the project, Tung said that because Mr. Dang, the police chief of Da Kao neighborhood, asked Mr. Nam to collect some of the belongings and passports of the people in this house, so I accepted. idea for Mr. Nam to work.
Regarding the children of the 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem project, Tung said: “I asked Ms. Thao to hand me the work, but I don’t know who is in the project.”
The trial continues.
