[ad_1]
The defendant Nguyen Hai Nam was escorted to court on the morning of December 30 – Photo: QUANG Định
Sharing the same point of view, the lawyers defending the defendant Lam Hoang Tung cite many reasons why Tung is not guilty.
The lawyers cited many legal regulations that the deposit transaction between Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi and Ms. Hoang Thi Thu Thao has not been completed, so far the house under construction is still owned. won by Ms. Chi. Ms. Thao has no right to the house, so she has no right to reside here.
On what basis do the procedural authorities recognize the right to unlawfully confiscate Ms Thao’s work and the right to use, possess and reside with Ms Thao in the aforementioned works?
The lawyer also cited many documents that expressed Ms. Chi’s will, asking Ms. Thao to hand over the construction works to correct the mistake. The attorneys also cited many documents from construction inspectors that require the investor to repair violations in the construction.
The lawyer also questioned why the authorities did not evict Ms. Thao and the people who lived in this construction but still allowed the work to be violated, forced to suspend construction, forced neighbors and business?
According to the lawyer, during the decision process of the authorities on the violation of the project, the Popular Committee of the Da Kao neighborhood did not move to stop the violations of this construction.
During the investigation, Ms Thao provided a document showing that she had registered her company at 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem in 2017.
However, when checking the file, the lawyer said that this evidence had signs of falsification because there was no basis to show that Ms. Thao had transferred her business to 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem. It is necessary to clarify this evidence because the judicial authorities believe that this evidence exists to confirm that the defendants violated the residence of Ms. Thao.
Regarding the behavior of the defendant Tung, the lawyers said that Tung is eligible to carry out bug fixes in the 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem construction project.
Lawyer Nguyen Minh Canh, former judge of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court, defended the accused Lam Hoang Tung – Photo: QUANG DINH
The accusation did not adequately reflect the objective reality and the case of the case, the lawyer said that the defendant Tung moved from the works in violation to ensure the certainty that Tung was implementing an administrative decision of authorities, not illegal acts.
Defendant Tung’s defense attorney said the clips posted on social media were a script, a trap set up for government officials and employees.
On the above basis, the lawyer said that what is considered the legitimate rights and interests of the victim Hoang Thi Thu Thao is actually a violation of the law, these rights are not protected by law. Therefore, the behavior of the accused does not constitute a crime.
Since then, the lawyer suggested that the Panel declare 2 defendants innocent and release them in court.
The trial continues.
Recommended sentence of up to 30 months in prison
Earlier in the impeachment section, the representative of Ho Chi Minh City VKSND said that although the defendants did not plead guilty, they all admitted their actions taken, so there was sufficient reason to prove that the defendants violated their accommodation. of Ms. Hoang Thi Thu Thao and the people living in house 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem.
Therefore, the VKS representative proposed a prison term of up to 24 months for Nguyen Hai Nam and up to 30 months in prison for Lam Hoang Tung.
