[ad_1]
On the afternoon of December 4, the Ho Chi Minh City legal journalist contacted Mr. Nguyen Dinh Trung, Director of the Higher VKSND in Ho Chi Minh City, to discuss the decision to suspend the case. and suspend the accused against Mr. Luong Huu. Phuoc. It was Mr. Phuoc who committed suicide at the headquarters of the Binh Phuoc Province People’s Court just after receiving the appeal ruling from this court.
Ms. Le Thi Tu (Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc’s wife) spoke with PV Ho Chi Minh City Law about the case. Photo: MINH TAM
Mr. Nguyen Dinh Trung said that he has not received the VKSND documents and reports in Binh Phuoc province, so he cannot respond. However, Mr. Trung said that when he had the file in hand he would consider this case.
Before that, on December 2, the investigation agency (CQĐT), Dong Xoai City Police decided to suspend the investigation of the criminal case, suspend the investigation of the accused against Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc for the real reason. Presenting dangerous behavior to dead society.
When he was still alive, Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc always said that it was an injustice, that the accident that caused his friend’s death after death was not his fault. Photo: CTV
Dong Xoai VKSND talked about the suspension
On December 4, PV Ho Chi Minh City Law He also discussed with the leaders of Dong Xoai VKSND (Binh Phuoc) city about the suspension of the above defendants.
Dong Xoai VKSND leaders said: First, for the cassation review level requests, the CQDT has fully done, what problems can be done and what problems can not be clearly established. Second, the VKS still claimed that Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc committed a crime, the suspension of the case is due to the death of the defendant and no one else involved, not because Mr. Phuoc is not guilty.
As for the request for experimental investigation in the appeal decision of the Ho Chi Minh City High Court Judges Committee, Dong Xoai VKSND leader said that it has already been proven, the request to determine the speed is also requested. In addition, this leader added that the investigation process required a speed assessment but did not have a basis for determining the speed of each vehicle, so it was not based on speed but on errors.
|
A heartbreaking suicide caused a stir in public opinion How Ho Chi Minh City Law has reflected, on January 15, 2017, Mr. Phuoc took Mr. Tran Huu Quy to karaoke. After walking for a while, he saw that Mr. Quy was not wearing a helmet, so Mr. Phuoc took him to get the helmet. When Mr. Phuoc drove the car to turn left to cross the street, Mr. Lam Tuoi’s car crashed and Mr. Quy died. On May 29, at the second appeal trial, the Binh Phuoc Province People’s Court rejected the appeal against the Dong Xoai City People’s Court and sentenced Mr. Phuoc to three years in prison for violating the rules on driving a vehicle. Traffic on the road. In the afternoon of the same day, Mr. Phuoc came to this court and jumped from the second floor to the ground and died. A week later (June 5), the president of the High Level People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City appealed to the cassation review, proposed to cancel two lower court judgments of the Dong Xoai City People’s Court and appeals of the Binh Phuoc Provincial People’s Court to re-investigate. On the afternoon of June 12, the Judicial Committee of the High Level People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City, which heard the cassation review, accepted the appeal, annulled two first instance and appeal judgments, and requested the CQDT of the Binh Phuoc Provincial Police to accept and investigate. again. |
“That is the main mistake of the case and that is that when crossing the street, Mr. Phuoc does not pay attention to observe what leads to the consequences. Lam Tuoi’s guilt cannot be determined, his guilt is only an administrative infraction, he has not had a driver’s license for many years and still uses a normal vehicle.
People were drinking but on the right track, they didn’t give in but crashed, causing an unexpected event. If drinking alcohol has consequences, it is necessary to prove the error of speeding, go to the left of the lane that leads to the accident of your car (Mr. Phuoc – PV), which leads to the consequences … ”- analyzed the Leader.
Dong Xoai leader VKSND also stated that if the suspension is wrong, the superior will consider and cancel. Finally, he said that he wanted to hold a press conference chaired by the police to spread public opinion.
The scene of the suicide jump occurred at the headquarters of the Binh Phuoc Province People’s Court. Photo: CTV
Mr. Phuoc’s family complained about the suspension decision.
On the afternoon of December 4, lawyer Duong Vinh Tuyen said that Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc’s family had not received the conclusion of the investigation of the CQĐT case. However, lawyer Tuyen said that his wife Phuoc filed a complaint about the decision to suspend the investigation of the accused, to suspend the case.
Ms. Le Thi Tu (Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc’s wife) mentioned a number of confused.
Is it the Dong Xoai City Police Department that the CSDT investigated and clarified the objective truth of the case? Have you clarified the cause of the accident? CQĐT has experimentally investigated according to Lam Tuoi’s testimony to clarify why Lam Tuoi was shocked, so he turned the wheel to the right and hit the car controlled by Mr. Phuoc, while previously he was at a distance of 30. m Lam Tuoi saw her husband slowly cross the street?
Ms. Tu also said that CQĐT issued a document to suspend the investigation of the criminal case and to suspend the investigation of the accused against Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc. Since then, Ms. Tu has asked the head of the Dong Xoai City Police Department to revoke, cancel the decision to suspend the suspect’s investigation against Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc and revoke the notice to suspend the investigation of the criminal case. , lay off. Investigate the accused.
Ms. Tu asked the Dong Xoai City Police Department to investigate and clarify many issues raised in the cassation review decision of the High Level People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City. If the cause of the accident is caused by someone else, they must prosecute and at the same time conclude that Mr. Luong Huu Phuoc did not commit the crime and suspend the accused, justify Mr. Phuoc.
[ad_2]
