[ad_1]
The sudden death of Dr. Bui Quang Tin, leaving a lot of pain for family and friends. Public opinion expressed regret, requiring authorities to find the cause of death and handle people who have committed crimes (if applicable) is normal.
Social networks do legal work (?)
Unfortunately, some of the Facebook accounts have gone too far without the conclusion of a competent authority, but they released information detailing the responsibility for the victim’s death to an individual from the University of HCMC Banking. . The authorities will clarify if this individual is related to the death of the victim. How much wrongdoing of this person will certainly be handled there; If there is a crime, they will be punished by law.
The apartment building where lawyer Bui Quang Tin fell
More significantly, just a day after the victim’s death, social media released the report of Ms. Nguyen Thanh Bich, the victim’s wife, accusing a vice chancellor of Ho Chi Minh City Banking University of conflict with the victim and the suspect that her husband was killed by this person.
Bich’s accusation and suspicion of her husband’s murder are perfectly appropriate, but the fact that the report was sent to the police station was leaked almost immediately and spread on social media. Strange Is this leak accidental or has someone intentionally spread it to pressure the investigative agency? Those who have leaked or leaked this report on social media and for what purpose, will be verified by the authorities.
When the report was leaked, a lot of information about the staff, reputation and honor of the person mentioned in the affected app was exposed on social media. Some accounts also used verbal abuse, name-calling, condemning the person named in the report as a criminal, while the prosecution agency has yet to institute the case.
If the victim’s death is a criminal case, there is nothing to discuss. Conversely, if the authorities conclude that the death of Dr. Bui Quang Tin was not caused by the person named in the report, his honor is violated by the person responsible for the person named on social media. , prestige, dignity?
The research information is too detailed!
According to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) of 2015, the procedure is only processed when signs of crime are determined. Upon receiving criminal complaints, investigative bodies will carry out pre-procedural activities to determine whether or not there are signs of criminals to issue one of the following decisions: Institute criminal cases; Without judgment of the case; Temporarily suspend the resolution of complaints and information about criminals.
In the Bui Quang Tin victim incident, the Ho Chi Minh City Police Department received a criminal report and carried out a series of investigative activities. According to the CrPC and the Criminal Investigation Organization Law, the information in the criminal investigation process is confidential, not disclosed.
Police scene examination
For this incident, the public is very interested, so the press agencies “hunt” the investigative agencies’ investigative activities is inevitable. However, some media outlets reported too many details about the victim’s wife’s meetings with investigative authorities. Even the analysis, giving assumptions, suspicions that the victim’s wife sent to the investigative agency, were also published on Facebook.
Therefore, the media should be more responsible for selecting and publishing information during the investigation of the investigating agency. More than anyone else, press agencies should be vigilant, not allowing any person or organization to lead the information story when the procedural authorities have not reached the final conclusion on the case.
[ad_2]
