[ad_1]
On December 19, following the impeachment portion of the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City Civil Engineering Institute (VKS), lawyers continued to defend the client in the cases of Dinh La Thang, Dinh Ngoc System and 18 other defendants who they made mistakes in the case. purchase and sale of toll collection rights in HCMC – Trung Luong.
|
Ut “bald” was recommended to life imprisonment, compensation 725 billion |
However, according to the System’s lawyers, the allegation is unfounded. Because, in the process of public investigation and judicial interrogation, the System declares not to order subordinates to falsify financial statements; concealment of income.
In addition, other defendants also falsified the financial statements of Yen Khanh Company in order to participate in the auction to buy the collection rights. Therefore, the prosecution agency does not have any evidence to prove fraudulent acts of falsification of financial statements to seize more than 725 billion VND, as a prosecution charge.
|
Dinh La Thang repeatedly denied the charges of wrongdoing in the highway project. |
The state fully raised Dong 2,004 billion, no damage
Furthermore, according to lawyers, cheating is the basic characteristic of fraudulent misappropriation. But to constitute this crime, the offenders must also have acts of appropriation of goods.
“But in this case, it is necessary to clarify that after paying more than 2.004 billion VND to win the winning auction for the right to collect fees, all proceeds from the collection of fees belong to Yen Khanh Company. Furthermore, the economic contract between the Ministry of Transport and the Yen Khanh Company does not show that the Yen Khanh Company has to pay a sum of money to the State, ”said Defendant System’s lawyer.
Dinh Ngoc System tomorrow 19.12.2018 |
Also according to the lawyer, 725 billion VND off the book is still essentially the Yen Khanh Company, that is, the Dinh Ngoc System. And the act of intervention of the software to hide income is not an appropriation of property, due to this amount of Mr. System.
On the crime of “abusing positions and powers to influence others to take advantage” of more than 3.4 billion dong in the purchase of a cheap villa, the lawyer said that the subject of this crime is a person in charge. , but the Dinh Ngoc system is not
At the same time, the prosecution agency has no basis to demonstrate that Mr. System acts by affecting the person with positions and powers in Viet Tri BOT JSC so that Licogi 13 Joint Stock Company can execute the items in the package. XL01 – 3. Since then, Licogi 13 has sold us cheap villas, ranging from more than 18 billion VND to approximately 15 billion VND.
The attorney also suggested that the value of the villa should be reassessed at the time the defendant purchased, rather than at the time Licogi 13 Company announced the sale price.
|
Dinh Ngoc System: “I didn’t ask for Dinh La Thang” Dinh Ngoc System came forward in full agreement with the views of the defense attorney. Dinh Ngoc System also apologized to the prosecution agencies for incorrectly saying on a number of issues, that “the properties are not mine, but they are actually mine. The property is mine, but the child is in his name; in the auction is my policy, as for other lies, I do not know and I am very frustrated. In addition, Dinh Ngoc System submitted not asking Dinh La Thang to access and win the auction for the right to charge fees; never called Duong Tuan Minh (former CEO of Yen Khanh Corporation. Earlier, in the impeachment section, the VKS proposed Dinh Ngoc a life sentence for the two previous offenses. The remaining 17 defendants report to the Ministry of Transport and their accomplices with Dinh Ngoc System in the case are proposed by VKS to a sentence of 2 to 12 years in prison, depending on the role in the case. |
[ad_2]
